Can These Science Concepts Help Us Understand This Market?

Good Morning,

 

U.S. equities closed flat to higher Friday, taking a bit of a breather from their most recent record run, while investors awaited President Donald Trump's speech to Congress next week.

 

Nevertheless, stocks rallied in the last half-hour of trading Friday to recover losses from earlier in the session. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, which closed up 0.05 percent, has now hit daily highs for 11 consecutive sessions, its longest streak of records since 1987. The S&P 500 Index and Nasdaq Composite Index also finished higher, while the Russell 2000 Index lost ground.


On the local front, the TSX had a no good very bad day on Friday as earnings and dividend disappointments among gold companies, along with weakening oil prices and trepidation over President Donald Trump’s border tax proposals, erased two-thirds of this year’s rally. Not to mention the fact that growth is disappointing, Trudeau has run out of fiscal runway and inflation is higher than it has been in 2 years...

 

Our Take

 

Amidst the growing stock market euphoria it should be noted that gold rose for a fourth week after U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said Thursday that he expects low borrowing costs to persist, sparking a drop in the dollar.

 

The bond market also seems to be at odds with the bullishness of the stock market as the benchmark 10-year note yield fell to 2.33 percent, while the two-year note yield declined to 1.15 percent. We would caution that it appears like bonds could have it right — that growth is coming, but probably not as quickly as the stock market would like to think.

 

The S&P 500 is up more than 10 percent since Trump's Nov. 8 victory, rising on the election, trading flat through much of December, then jumping again in the new year. The yield on the benchmark 10-year note immediately spiked as well, surging 38 percent to 2.6 percent by mid-December.           

                                           

However, the yield, generally seen as a proxy for GDP growth plus the inflation rate, has fallen somewhat since then as fixed income investors have continued to buy government debt. Bonds often lose their lustre during boom times, particularly if inflation sets in.

 

There are other signs that investors are having some misgivings about growth.

                                               

Copper prices, which are seen as a reliable mirror of growth, tumbled about 3 percent Thursday after Mnuchin's comments. The metal, sometimes called "Dr. Copper" for its ability to signal the economy's direction, is up about 11 percent since the election but has fallen 4 percent since its mid-February peak.

 

These counter trends should be considered as contrarian indicators. THERE IS STILL CONSIDERABLE BEARISHNESS in this market.

 

Furthermore, perhaps investors, after 10 years of living in constant fear over a succession of financial and political cataclysms, have finally decided to tune out the headlines and focus instead on an economy that, while not great, is not doing so bad, either.

 

Ed Yardeni, a stock market strategist, calculates that savings deposits and money market funds, the two safest and lowest return options for the risk-wary, doubled to nearly $9 trillion at the end of last month from $4.5 trillion in early 2009. Since 2007 households in the USA have been a net seller of stocks, and have shrunk the amount of their financial assets in stocks by 18.6% since that time!

 

Perhaps a lot of this pent-up cash earning close to zero in terms of interest rates is finally going to start looking for higher returns in the stock market — with pension funds in particular leading the way. Perhaps, people are slowly starting to realize that you can get bent out of shape living in a sensationalist media environment but this noise has little to do with earnings and the valuation of those earnings in the stock market...

 

Thought of the Week

 

"We live in a world exquisitely dependent upon science and technology, in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology." -Carl Sagan

 

Stories and Ideas of Interest

 

  • These are the science concepts you need to know to understand political life in 2017. It’s early days of 2017 still, but already it’s become apparent that this year science will play a larger role in public discourse than it has in the past, at least in the US. The scientific community has found itself at odds with the new White House administration in countless ways, and is gearing up for a fight that will take place in labs and hacker spaces, in the halls of civic buildings, and in streets nationwide. Quartz has put together a compendium of the scientific concepts and terms that will be at the heart of these conversations—and will characterize the world of scientific discovery through the rest of the year. Concept #1 and perhaps the most important: skepticism: the application of reason to any and all ideas...

 

  • 7 earth-like planets found orbiting star 39 light-years away. Scientists have discovered what looks like the best place so far where life as we know it may exist outside our own solar system. The new findings raise hope that further systems are waiting to be discovered, the researchers say. And it's something that astronomers and exoplanet hunters are eager to explore.

 

  • The anatomy of charisma. What makes a person magnetic and why we should be wary. Nautlius puts together an excellent historical account of charisma showing both the positive and the negative. Charisma will never be stamped out nor should it be yet the way to protect people from the dark side of charisma is to teach them how it works. It is best thought of like fire. It can be used to heat your house or burn it all down…

 

 

  • Rich people literally see the world differently. Science of us magazine presents some controversial research demonstrating that “people who are higher in socioeconomic status have diminished neural responses to others’ pain,” the authors write. “These findings suggest that empathy, at least some early component of it, is reduced among those who are higher in status.” Generalizations are problematic but there are interesting implications for why  lower-class people are more attuned to the people around them. The authors write that “higher-status people are more focused on their own goals and desires. They also ignore people a little more, maybe because they can afford to. “If you have more power and status, you may not have to care as much about what people are thinking and feeling; and also, if you’re in a resource-scarce environment, where things are a little more unpredictable and maybe a little more dangerous, it would be very adaptive to pay attention to others, how they’re feeling and what they’re going to do.”

 

  • The next financial crisis may be in your driveway. Lured by low interest rates, low gas prices, and a crop of seductive vehicles that are faster, smarter, and more efficient than ever before, American drivers are increasingly riding in style. Nevertheless, all the glitter ain’t gold —those swanky machines are heavily leveraged. The country’s auto debt hit a record in the fourth quarter of 2016, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, when a rush of year-end car shopping pushed vehicle loans to a dubious peak of $1.16 trillion. The combination of new car smell and new credit woes stretches from Subarus in Maine to Teslas in San Francisco. Is it a surprise that Americans just clocked their biggest spike in stress in more than a decade...

 

  • As we sit at record highs in the market we should ask: should stocks be worth more now than they used to be? Stocks are not cheap. The CAPE ratio is 28.46, above the long-term average of 16.73 and more expensive than 96% of all readings. But exactly how expensive are they, and what might this mean for future returns? Michael Batnick puts together a very smart piece suggesting that expensive markets leave investors with a smaller margin for error. The more you pay, the less you get. Nevertheless, he makes some intelligent observations to counter the popular argument: “stocks are expensive, sell everything.” Let’s remember that long-term average stock returns smooth over the bull and bear markets that investors experience, and no two market cycles ever unfold the exact same way. Bull and bear markets can vary significantly in both duration and magnitude...

 

All the best for a productive week,

 

Logos LP

Contrarian Indicators Flashing

Good Morning,
 

U.S. equities closed mixed on Friday, but squeezed out another record close, while data released Thursday pointed to improving economic conditions in the U.S., with the Philadelphia Federal Reserve manufacturing index hitting its highest level since 1984, while weekly jobless claims remained around their lowest levels in decades.

 

Our Take

Buy baby buy. Forget any bearish news. Shrug it off and continue to buy stocks. This seems to be the prevailing mood right now with pullbacks lasting hours rather than days.


The issue is that when you look at the underlying fundamentals, they are quite good as companies are posting growth in earnings, rather than gaining because of some vague promise of tax cuts.

 

Although the rally has left the S&P 500 trading at three times book value for the first time since 2004, market-capitalization weighted earnings likely rose 10 percent in the fourth-quarter from a year earlier, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Of the 358 members that have reported results so far, 72 percent have shown profit growth.

 

Furthermore, inflation appears to be finally picking up. Since the global financial crisis, historically low inflation and restrained economic growth has allowed central banks to keep interest rates at record low levels. However, most policy makers are now anxious to return to a more “normal” environment where they will have more latitude to tighten or loosen monetary policy in response to changing circumstances. Even though they have kept policy on hold for now, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve are all anticipating higher inflation ahead, although it isn’t clear how quickly they will start raising rates.

 

Nevertheless, there are a few key things to take note of so as to take the temperature of the market and maintain one’s good sense as the market moves higher:  

 

  1. Notorious bears are starting to capitulate. Prem Watsa and George Soros just this week have changed their stance unwinding their shorts and getting long the Trump trade.
     

  2. The world’s largest sovereign wealth fund increased its allocation to equities: with the amount of noise out there about market being toppish it is interesting to see the Norwegian government looking to increase its allocation to equities. Late on Thursday afternoon, the Norwegian government proposed investing 70% of the country's £723 billion fund in the equity markets.
     

  3. Hedge funds piled into the consensus trades in Q4 2016: long the USD, long financials, healthcare, consumer discretionary, REITS and short tech, consumer staples, utilities and and bonds. Is the consensus ever right?
     

  4. There are still a lot of very negative bearish commentary all over the internet regarding the existence of a “bubble” and impending stock crash. This may be a significant contrarian indicator.
     

  5. There are still several black swan risks. The most significant being Marine Le Pen being elected as President in France. This would surely be a grave threat to the integrity of the European Union. In addition, Eurozone finance ministers and the IMF seem likely to miss next week's deadline to agree on a €7B bailout for Greece.

       

Musings
 

I was at a financial marketing conference in Orlando this week and had many great opportunities to chat with Americans about their new President Donald Trump. Many showed great disdain, some had no opinion, others expressed concern regarding his unpredictability and some were optimistic. Nevertheless, the prevailing mood amongst the stock market participants that I talked to was that his presidency is just not that relevant with regards to the direction of the stock market.

What lessons can we glean from this? Well first and foremost we should avoid letting our political opinions shape our investing decisions. Whether our savings should be in stocks, bonds or cash depends on our risk profile and our time horizon/investment goals. It should not be a function of our attitudes towards our heads of state.

There is no doubt that uncertainty can cause problems for markets yet allowing our political preferences to influence our investing decisions can cause us to misconstrue risk and/or to see more or less of it when there may in fact be less or more.

What we should remember is that the possibility of a major correction is EVER PRESENT.

This is the case no matter who is at the wheel and is more dependent upon economic cycles than on policy decisions. Thus, given current valuations which appear to be at the high end on a historical basis, the more intelligent question should be whether we are ok with say a 25% correction at this point in our lives?

If the answer is no, then less money should be allocated to stocks. If the answer is yes then perhaps we should keep on keeping on as stocks tend to offer excellent returns over the long term. Consider this illuminating chart from First Trust which highlights the historical performance of the S&P 500 Index throughout the U.S. Bull and Bear markets from 1926 through 2016.

 

-The average Bull Market period lasted 8.9 years with an average cumulative total return of 490%
 

-The average Bear Market period lasted 1.3 years with an average cumulative loss of -41%

Thought of the Week
 

" Roll with it.” -Charlie Munger to Trump Haters


Stories and Ideas of Interest

 

  • Contrarian indicator or indicator of the end? Wine glimmers like gold as investors see end to stocks rally. The benchmark wine index posted its first gain in six years. Bloomberg finds that: “Prices for fine wines have climbed to their highest levels since October 2011 on speculation that equities near record highs are poised to drop. Wines and the funds that buy them are being viewed much like gold -- as a store of value in uncertain times -- after the U.K. voted to leave the European Union and the U.S. elected Donald Trump as president.”

     

  • Housing bubble headlines in Canada are back in vogue, driven mostly by strength in the Toronto market. The annual rate of national house price inflation climbed to 13.0% year-over-year in January, up from the prior month's reading of 12.3%, according to the Teranet-National Bank Composite House Price Index. The jump was at least partially due to the ongoing housing boom in Toronto, which saw the annual rate of inflation climb to 20.9% year-over-year, up from 19.7%. Additionally, Reuters reports that Hamilton, an area near Toronto, saw home prices spike by 17.6% year-over-year as buyers were "shut out of the expensive Toronto market." A lot of this bearishness is nothing new yet one thing did jump out at me was new data indicating that the latest census figures show that Toronto’s population is growing at its slowest pace in 40 years. Is this sustainable?   

 

  • More Canadians are raiding their RRSP to buy a house, make ends meet and pay off debt. A new survey suggests Canadians are dipping into their registered retirement savings plans like never before and the high cost of housing may be driving those decisions.

 

  • Facebook has mega ambitions for job ads and our brains. Alison Griswold for Quartz suggests that: “Facebook’s users include LinkedIn’s ‘thought leaders’ and white-collar professionals, but they’re also people seeking hourly positions, part-time work, and other opportunities that they’d probably find on sites like Monster, Indeed, or Craigslist long before LinkedIn.” Facebook isn’t chasing Linkedin. It is chasing a far bigger jobs market. In other Facebook news, Bloomberg considers the danger of Facebook’s plan to rewire our lives…

 

  • Could the chaos of the industrial revolution be about to return? Bloomberg considers the argument that when old jobs are lost to technology, new ones will be created. The author suggests that upon closer study of the industrial revolution, this rosy thesis should be revised as this period of time brought calamity…

 

  • Fast food can reveal the secrets of an economy. The BBC digs into fast food indicators: “What is an economist’s favourite food? Burgers, chips and pizza might not immediately come to mind – but the consumption of meals like these can signal changes in people’s economic behaviour. Knowing the price of pizza in New York or the cost of a Big Mac in Beirut can tell market-watchers how the world’s cogs are turning.”

 

  • How can companies become and stay innovative? Fantastic work from BCG complete with excellent data and analysis on the top 50 most innovative companies in 2016.

 

All the best for a productive week,


Logos LP

Is Hudbay Minerals Poised to Break Out?

Hudbay Minerals (TSE: HBM) is a global metals producer in Canada focused on copper and zinc in addition to gold and silver with operations mostly focused in South America. The company has risen significantly recently (up over 50% YTD and over 200% in the past year) but I believe there is more room to run under current macroeconomic conditions.

Out of all the mining operators in Canada, Hudbay has one of the healthiest balance sheets around with very manageable debt levels, sustained positive retained earnings and ample cash. Further, the company is a very efficient operator in mining as it has a 14% FCF to sales conversion rate (vs. Teck’s 2.18%) and is more attractively valued than Teck (price to sales is 1.8x versus 2.4x for Teck) with a forward PE of 11x. The company recently exceeded production guidance at its Constancia mine in Peru and its zinc operations are on an upswing given higher than expected ramp-up in its Lalor mine, which contained higher than anticipated zinc grades. Zinc prices have been higher in 2017 and copper prices are expected to swell from $2.18/lb to $2.81/lb over the next 6-8 months. This price increase in copper stems from higher than usual demand from China, reduction in copper stocks within global warehouses, weaker global currencies vs. the USD and a current labor shortage due to strikes at BHP’s largest mine in Chile. We believe that Hudbay is poised to continue to ramp up production in its Peruvian copper mine to take advantage of these prices (cap ex for that mine are expected to grow by $25 million over the coming year) and that prices will hit close to forecast by mid-May.

Our price target on the name is $16.77 as we expect these catalysts to take shape at a faster rate under this maturing bull market. However, we believe that this is not a long term investment (given our long range copper forecast) and investors should consider taking all profits above $18.10 regardless of a change in copper price forecasts.

Logos LP is has no position in HBM.

What Is History Telling Us About This Market?

Good Morning,

Stocks concluded a third straight week of gains Friday, climbing to new record highs a day after President Donald Trump promised to release a “phenomenal” tax plan in the near future. The man went so far as to say in a meeting with airline executives Thursday that “lowering overall tax burden on American business is big league” pleasing investors with his renewed focus on the business environment.
 

Economic data also continued to paint a mostly positive picture of the U.S. economy, after Thursday’s unexpectedly low number of Americans filing for jobless claims and as corporations added to one of the best sets of earnings since the financial crisis.
 

In addition, enthusiasm for the equity market is surging in 2017, according to a BNP Paribas SA measure of investor sentiment called the Love-Panic indicator. The index, which takes into account options positioning, equity fund flows and sentiment surveys, reached the highest since April 2014 on Monday, the last reading….
 

On the local front Canada’s economy added 48,000 jobs in January while economists were expecting job losses. Growth has exceeded expectations for 2 straight months reinforcing the message that the job market may have turned the corner. The problem is that pay gains were slowest since 2003. Furthermore, this week Fitch Ratings warned that potential U.S. protectionism puts countries like Canada at the highest risk of damage to their credit fundamentals.
 

Our Take
 

As we said last week this is a policy driven market. Investors were fretting that Trump had put tax reform on the backburner and now it appears to again be a priority. This is welcome news for markets. Last week Trump got bogged down with a series of bizarre tweets and other immigration noise and this week he appears to be back on track. Expect further volatility as he vacillates between sensible economic priorities and the sensationalist triviality.
 

As for sentiment appearing to reach levels not seen since 2014, it is important to take the temperature of the market. Was the market telling us to walk away in 2014? Were we at a top in 2014? Despite the myriad of pitfalls which could beset the market, perhaps we are just getting going. Things are always uncertain and uncomfortable when you are living in it and so obvious and sure when you are looking back. Lloyd Blankfein this week stated that:
 

“The change in the market today is from a cycle where we were of very low economic activity, consequently very low interest rates, and a very, very high level of—maybe call it pessimism about where we go. And it feels like we’re changing to one in which it’s going to get growthier. More growth out there, more opportunity and one in which we are getting a bit more optimistic.”
 

Nevertheless, other big names like George Soros, Seth Klarman and Stan Druckenmiller remain more bearish as they believe investors seem to have been lulled into a false sense of security.


Update on our Best Ideas for 2017
 

Peter Mantas
 
Huntington Ingalls Industries (NYSE: HII): +8.77% YTD
Cemex SAB de CV (NYSE: CX): +12.58% YTD
S&P 500: 3.45% YTD
 
Matthew Castel
 
Aaron Inc. (NASDAQ: AAON): +3.93% YTD
Syntel (NASDAQ: SYNT): +12.35% YTD
S&P 500: 3.45% YTD


Musings
 

I read an interesting book this week: Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business by Neil Postman. This book written in the 80s, covered the media’s effect on us suggesting that there were two key dystopian novels written by British cultural critics: Brave New World by Aldous Huxley and Nineteen Eighty Four by George Orwell – and that Americans mistakenly feared the latter. In the Orwellian future the state overtly censors what we see, hear and experience. Individuality is emaciated while movement and freedom are overtly restricted. In the Huxley version citizens are sedated by technology, conspicuous consumption and self-righteous instant gratification.
 

Postman believed that it was Huxley’s vision we should be worried about. He wrote:
 

“What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture.”
     
      
Our information environment has become our entertainment environment. Facts have become blurred with opinion and public debate has degenerated into superfluous sound bites. The average person now spends roughly 74 hours in front of a screen in a given week and checks their phone over 150 times a day.
 

The concerning part is that unlike the Orwellian world in which control is overt, it is more difficult to resist in a world in which we are lead to believe we occupy the center of….


Thought of the Week

 

"That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all lessons that history has to teach.” –Aldous Huxley



Stories and Ideas of Interest

 

  • Snapchat destroys value and thus its IPO is pre-mature. We keep getting questions about the impending Snap IPO and based on our reading of the S-1 IPO filing it is too early for such a move. Tim Connors puts together a compelling account as to why Snap has not proven that they have a great business (not a single dollar of gross margin). Going public now as a business that loses more money the more users they get isn’t fair to the founders, those who would buy the IPO (not the 1% but the retirement savings of American workers) and those founders who have created value-generating ventures. Perhaps Snap should take notice of Twitter’s dismal earnings report this week (Twitter has been losing around $100 million a quarter for the past three years, and its user growth has been essentially flat) in order to see what may be in store if glaring business-model questions are not addressed. Quartz digs in and asks whether Snap will be the next Facebook, a humble startup turned massive, revenue-generating cash cow? Or will it be the next Twitter, a company that can’t seem to grow or make money? Not a company we would invest in but important to watch as a barometer for the "growth at all costs" model.


     

  • Seth Klarman speaks in a private letter to his investors. This famed value investor who has lost money in only 3 of the last 34 years weighed in on Trump suggesting that investors have become hypnotized by all the talk of pro-growth policies, without considering the full ramifications. He worries, for example, that Mr. Trump’s stimulus efforts “could prove quite inflationary, which would likely shock investors.” He also finds that “The big picture for investors is this: Trump is high volatility, and investors generally abhor volatility and shun uncertainty,” he wrote. “Not only is Trump shockingly unpredictable, he’s apparently deliberately so; he says it’s part of his plan.” He also had an interesting perspective on the many hedge funds that have underperformed over the last 5 years: “With any asset class, when substantial new money flows in, the returns go down.” He also sounded the alarm on ETFs suggesting that “stocks outside the indices may be cast adrift, no longer attached to the valuation grid but increasingly off of it.” “This should give long-term value investors a distinct advantage,” he wrote. “The inherent irony of the efficient market theory is that the more people believe in it and correspondingly shun active management, the more inefficient the market is likely to become.”

 

  • The United States is coming to resemble two countries, one rural and one urban. What happens when they go to war? Although I’m not a fan of dividing groups of people, I found this description of America in The Atlantic to be quite interesting. Perhaps dividing people between red states and blue states is no longer that helpful when one is attempting to understand the fault lines of American politics. Perhaps instead the gulf between urban and nonurban voters is wider than it ever has been. David Graham writes: “An important lesson of last year’s presidential election is that American political norms are much weaker than they had appeared, allowing a scandal-plagued, unpopular candidate to triumph—in part because voters outside of cities objected to the pace of cultural change. Another lesson is that the United States is coming to resemble two separate countries, one rural and one urban. Only one of them, at present, appears entitled to self-determination.”

 

  • The term “fake news” is officially meaningless. Once upon a time the term was used to refer to completely fabricated stories about politicians. Today the term has been hijacked to mean any news someone doesn’t like.

 

  • Donald Trump might be more popular than you think. Once again there is evidence suggesting
    that traditional polls are not accurately measuring support for the president and his policies. Support appears to increase when the poll is conducted using more anonymous methodologies…Could there be a difference between what one believes and what one will say publicly. Could their be a “social desirability bias”?

 

  • Could coding be the next blue-collar job? Provocative piece in Wired suggesting that for decades, pop culture has overpromoted the “lone genius” coder. “We’ve cooed over the billionaire programmers of The Social Network and the Anonymized, emo, leather-clad hackers of Mr. Robot. But the real heroes are people who go to work every day and turn out good stuff—whether it’s cars, coal, or code.”

 

  • Sex doesn’t sell any more, activism does. And don’t the big brands know it. From Starbucks supporting refugees to Kenco taking on gangs, big businesses are falling over themselves to do good – and to let us know about it. Great piece in the Guardian outlining how political business has become. There is no room for humility when a brand does a good deed and sadly brands are allowing people to pat themselves on the back without them personally having to sacrifice anything.

 

All the best for a productive week,


Logos LP

Can Stories Destroy An Economy?

Good Morning,
 

U.S. equities rallied on Friday, with financials rising around 2 percent, following a stronger-than-expected employment report.

 

The Dow Jones industrial average jumped around 180 points — posting its best trading day of the year — signalling that the Trump rally may still be intact. 

 

The U.S. economy added 227,000 jobs in January, while the unemployment rate ticked higher to 4.8 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said Friday. Economists polled by Reuters expected payrolls to grow by 175,000 with the unemployment rate holding steady.

 

Another factor improving investor sentiment was the move on Friday by Trump to sign executive orders aimed at watering down financial regulations in the U.S. This move lifted the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) by 2 percent.


 

Our Take

 

Remember when people used to talk about the Federal Reserve? No longer. What we are looking at is a structural shift in the market from a Fed-driven market to a policy driven market. 


Musings
 

Do humans for the most part act rationally, or are they for the most part driven by emotion? To what extent can our decisions and judgements be tainted by emotion? Can stories and rumours throw an entire economy off course? 

 

I read a fascinating piece this week by Mark Buchanan a physicist and science writer which took up a theme I alluded to in a previous letter that rhetoric can become reality. Sentiment can cause outcomes. 

 

In his piece, Buchanan fleshes out this concept by demonstrating how narratives can spread economic uncertainty, discouraging consumer spending and business investment. 

 

In a recent speech Yale University Economist Robert Shiller made arguments about the Great Depression and the 2008 financial crisis. 

 

In the 2000s people passed around stories about getting rich flipping homes and this contributed to a belief that home prices would always rise. The real estate industry as well as the financial industry played into this but the key is that most appeared to buy into this narrative. Dissenting voices were few and far between. (Sound like the familiar narrative you hear in Toronto with home prices jumping 22%?)

 

Schiller has written extensively on these topics yet his new work has coined the term “narrative economics” - the idea that stories more more like infectious agents, with some being much more contagious than others, and that an epidemiological approach might help to better understand their movement. This is becoming more of a reality as we are able to perform more complete analyses of news feeds and social media. 

 

If moods, feelings and emotions drive decision making to what extent to they drive markets and economies? 

 

As Buchanan states: 

 

“It is perhaps appropriate that the power of stories is gaining greater recognition during the age of Donald Trump, who rose to the presidency thanks in large part to an utter disregard for objective reality. As Shiller acknowledges, Trump is a “master of narrative." Let's hope this one doesn’t prove to be disastrous.” 

 

Pay attention to the prevailing mood. Take the temperature of the stories and narratives that dominate the hearts and minds of those that surround you. You may find that causality can be turned on its head…



Thought of the Week


 

"Words are but symbols for the relations of things to one another and to us; nowhere do they touch upon the absolute truth.” -Friedrich Nietzsche




Stories and Ideas of Interest

 

  • Since the election, your personal filter bubble has been a big topic of conversation. To solve this bias problem, Wired magazine suggests using tech to re-engineer your media diet. You can try an app called Discors or the Chrome browser extension EscapeYourBubble to help you better understand and accept others. Barry Ritholtz suggests that these are good places to start but that they miss the mark as bias is but one cognitive error we make. He offers a few additional steps here

     

  • The multinational company is in trouble. Mr Trump is unusual in his aggressively protectionist tone. But in many ways he is behind the times. Multinational companies, the agents behind global integration, were already in retreat well before the populist revolts of 2016. Their financial performance has slipped so that they are no longer outstripping local firms. Many seem to have exhausted their ability to cut costs and taxes and to out-think their local competitors. Mr Trump’s broadsides are aimed at companies that are surprisingly vulnerable and, in many cases, are already heading home. The impact on global commerce will be profound.

     

  • Inside the mind of a Snapchat streaker. Bloomberg dives into the life of an avid user demonstrating that the photo sharing app is dangerously addicting by design. This is a depressing account but a must for those who are not users. Timing is right given that this week Snapchat filed for an IPO stating in its filing that: "We have incurred operating losses in the past, expect to incur operating losses in the future, and may never achieve or maintain profitability.” Will the app’s addictiveness be enough to convince investors to overlook the company’s net loss: $514.64 million in 2016, wider than $372.89 million in 2015? 

     

  • People wouldn’t care if three quarters of brands disappeared: Survey showed. Havas Group's "Meaningful Brands" report shows that people wouldn't care if 74 percent of brands they use vanished. They also say that 60 percent of the content produced by companies is poor, irrelevant or failing to deliver. This is a clear sign that over communication is diluting brand value and thus making it more difficult for brands to grow. The fight for consumer attention has perhaps never been more difficult. 

    What is a meaningful brand? Delport defined a meaningful brand as one which functionally works, offers value for money and makes someone's life easier, as well as considering the impact it has on a community. 

 

All the best for a productive week,