politics

Everything is F*cked But Hope Springs Eternal

volodymyr-hryshchenko-7JAyy7jLTAk-unsplash.jpg

Good Morning,
 

U.S. stocks rose on Friday, recovering some of their losses for the week, as tech shares clawed back some of their big September declines. Nevertheless, despite Friday’s rally both the Dow and S&P 500 posted four-week losing streaks, their longest slides since August 2019.

 

The major averages have had a tough month, with the S&P 500 falling 5.8% in September. The Dow has dropped 4.4% over that time period and the Nasdaq is down 7.3% month to date.


Our Take


It is important to remember that there are always two ways to view the stock market at any given time. From an optimistic perspective, there is the potential for favorable results from the Phase III clinical trials as early as the end of October, the elections could be decided in an orderly manner, large institutions and investors could put their record cash piles to work, earnings growth could take off as governments and central bankers continue to support the economy and holiday shopping could be impressive with limited disruption from COVID-19.

 

From a pessimistic perspective, one could say that all of those developments above are unlikely. No vaccine at all, the election results could be delayed and contested thus resulting in complete turmoil, as a second wave of COVID-19 prompts further economic shutdowns leading to economic collapse.

 

Whatever camp you fall into, it is important not to get swallowed by emotion as the reality will likely lay somewhere in between. 

 

Absent additional full economic shutdowns by governments in response to a second wave of COVID-19 (if this happens again all bets are off as the damage would likely be irreversible) we believe the recovery will continue albeit extraordinarily unevenly across industries and countries.  


The Economist recently revisited their “90% economy” prediction and found that economies certainly have begun to recover, yet the world is still a long way from normal. Governments continue to enforce social-distancing measures to keep the virus at bay. These reduce output—by allowing fewer diners in restaurants at a time, say, or banning spectators from sports arenas. People remain nervous about being infected. Economic uncertainty among both consumers and firms is near record highs—and this very probably explains companies’ reluctance to invest.

Screen Shot 2020-09-27 at 10.02.58 AM.png

Calculations by Goldman Sachssuggest that social-distancing measures continue to reduce global GDP by 7-8% and such measures are set to continue in most countries. Yet The Economist found that although the global economy is operating at about nine-tenths capacity, there is a lot of variation between industries and countries. Some are doing relatively—and surprisingly—well, others dreadfully.

 

When considering the respective performance of goods and services, goods have bounced back fast while services activity is a lot further below its pre-pandemic level. This is understandable as services require person to person interaction and thus when confidence is lacking, consumption of services wanes. 

 

Additionally, the magazine found that the huge gap between countries’ economic recovery can be attributed to: 1) industrial composition (countries which rely on retail and hospitality and laggards) 2) confidence (countries who had good leadership under lockdown) and 3) stimulus (countries that put in place large rescue package ie. America may still not be able to agree on a new one, yet still has ALREADY enacted the world’s largest package relative to the size of its economy). 

Screen Shot 2020-09-27 at 10.03.48 AM.png

In light of the above, and the fact that most developed countries seem to be hovering around a “90% economy”, should we opt for the pessimistic view of markets or the optimistic view? 

 

In our view, absent further draconian lockdowns, we believe that a 90% economy - one which could trend towards 95% if countries can better calibrate social-distancing measures without jeopardizing output - is certainly not a good enough reason for the patient long-term investor to significantly reduce equity exposure and move to cash or gold.


There will be scars to the economy and the recovery will take time, there will be more short term volatility in markets as political headlines and a record amount of derivatives trading foster instability, yet we remain hopeful and confident that holding quality businesses with unique secular tailwinds for the long-term, remains the right strategy.



Membership to Exclusive Daily Newsletter



We have launched an exclusive daily newsletter including actionable daily insights for DIY investors from Logos LP

  • Each Digest Contains the Following:

    • Key Market Technicals

    • Logos LP Watchlist 

    • Macro News

    • Logos LP Update

    • Alerts

Membership will initially be limited to 1000 members. Please subscribe here.


Musings
 

Over the course of the month of September it has struck me how emotional the last 6 months have been for most. How difficult it has been to wake up 6 months into the pandemic and read a variety of news headlines which are basically the same as those featured 5 months ago, 4 months ago 3 months ago etc.: 

 

-“Terrified’: Bar, restaurant, gym owners say they won’t make it if forced to close again”

-”New-York State Tops 1,000 New Daily Coronavirus Cases for First Time Since Early June”

-”Stock market crash: David Rosenberg warns of a dot-com-bubble, IPO mania”

-”The Death of the American Dream” 

 

The mood is sombre. Hope appears to be slipping away as pandemic fatigue sets in and this is precisely what we as a society need to combat: hopelessness. 

 

Flirting which such feelings myself over the last six months, I picked up a book this month with a title that unsurprisingly caught my attention: “Everything is Fucked: A Book About Hope” by Mark Manson (ironically written pre-Covid-19) 

 

While the book covers a lot of ground, what resonated with me was his explanation that “the human psyche needs hope to survive the way a fish needs water.”

 

He furthers that: 

 

Hope is the fuel for our mental engine. It’s the butter on our biscuit. It’s a lot of cheesy metaphors. Without hope, your whole mental apparatus will stall out or starve. If we don’t believe there’s any hope that the future will be better than the present, that our lives will improve in some way, then we spiritually die. After all, if there’s no hope of things ever being better, then why live- why do anything?” 

 

Without hope for the future one sinks into indifference and nihilism- the sense that there is no point, no broader “why?”. Without hope for the future, without a hope narrative that gives us a sense of purpose, we pursue the pure indulgence of desire. Success for the sake of success. Pleasure for the sake of pleasure. Power for the sake of power. Protest for the sake of protests. Shut downs for the sake of shut downs. Hysteria for the sake of hysteria. 

 

Manson reminds us that, hopelessness is the root of anxiety, mental illness and depression. It is the source of all misery and the cause of all addiction. Chronic anxiety is a crisis of hope. It is the fear of a failed future. Depression is a crisis of hope. It is the belief in a meaningless future. Should we be surprised that such mental illnesses are on an eighty year upswing among young people and a twenty year upswing among the adult population? 

 

The problem with COVID-19 six months in, is that it has exacerbated the crisis of hope which was plaguing the rich developed world well before the pandemic struck. Although a serious public health issue, we now have nothing short of a COVID-19 national hysteria. We’ve allowed the virus to take over our economy, our small businesses, our schools, our social lives, our quality of life and most importantly our hope for the future. 

 

This irrational sense of hopelessness is growing and those in power should carefully consider its effects when they set out to combat a second wave of COVID-19 and put policies in place to aid in the recovery. 

 

The human mind/human nature is the most powerful force on earth. Left misunderstood by those in power as well as by those acutely suffering from a lack of hope themselves, any recovery will be challenged. 

 

The rich developed world has made incredible progress in health, safety, material wealth and quality of life yet those are facts about the past, not the future. Hope doesn’t care about these things. Hope only cares about the problems that still need to be solved. Hope must be found in our visions for the future. 

 

We as individuals and as a society need to find our “why” again. Our personal hope narratives which give us a reason to believe that our tomorrows will be better than our todays. Our inspirational vision which gives us purpose. Which makes us smile, grounds us, helps us stay on course, joyful in the face of adversity and suffering.  

 

Somewhere along the way as we argue about whether everything is “rigged”, or whether we will “accept” to leave office, or what we are entitled to by virtue of our birth, or about how much we wish to take from others who have earned it to give to ourselves, or as we continue to surrender our economies and our lives to the virus, we’ve become lost. 

 

My hope is that we succeed in finding hope again. That will be the true recovery. 

Charts of the Month

Screen Shot 2020-09-27 at 10.53.28 AM.png

Where is hope trending? 

Screen Shot 2020-09-27 at 9.59.29 AM.png
Screen Shot 2020-09-27 at 10.00.17 AM.png
Survival.COVID.JPG

In Canada, the Covid-19 mortality rate is 0.024% and the chance of not dying from Covid-19 is 99.975% yet in a survey conducted on behalf of Global News, Ipsos found that 75% of respondents would approve of quickly shutting down non-essential businesses in the event of a second wave???

Why isn’t the media talking about this? That’s also what TIS Group asks in the USA, citing revised Centers for Disease Control statistics that say Covid-19 is only directly responsible for 6% of the reported Covid deaths in the U.S., or around 10-11,000 people. The rest of deaths reflect Covid as a contributing factor to existing illnesses, particularly among the elderly...

Balance Sheets.PNG
Debt.PNG
STEM.PNG
Judge.png
Judge.2.png

Logos LP August  2020 Performance

 


August 2020 Return: -0.71%
 

2020 YTD (August) Return: 50.36%
 

Trailing Twelve Month Return: 57.65%
 

Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) since inception March 26, 2014: +21.46%


 

Thought of the Month


 

"Fearlessness is not the absence of fear, but the willingness to walk into it. When I walk into my fear, practice there, sit upright in the middle of it, completely open to the experience, with no expectation of the outcome. Anything is possible. When our circumstances look impossible or terrifying, there is a way. -Judith Randall




Articles and Ideas of Interest

 

  • Interactive Brokers braces for election volatility by telling clients to put up more cash. Market action around the election is expected to be so volatile that Interactive Brokers is forcing clients to put up more money in order to trade using leverage. The retail broker is increasing margin requirements — how much money an investor using leverage and derivatives has in their brokerage account after a stock purchase — heading into the November presidential election, according to a clients letter obtained by CNBC.

  • Is Covid to blame for business closures or is it helping new startups? The answer may be both. A report found that more than 100,000 restaurants have closed this year, but another says new business applications are up by 19%. Everyone has their narrative about the plight of small business because it’s a political issue. The right wants to make it out that small businesses are suffering and state governments need to relax the shutdowns. The left says that not only small businesses, but their employees, are feeling pain and therefore significant stimulus is still needed. Both sides agree on some form of a more targeted round of the Paycheck Protection Program. Everyone’s right. Everyone’s wrong. The fact is that no one really knows for sure about the effects Covid has had on small businesses ... yet. We won’t know until this whole thing is over and researchers can comb through the data and that’s going to take a few years. I’m sure they’ll find that many businesses did close permanently because of the pandemic. But then again, how many of these businesses would have closed anyway? And how many were previously buoyed by a strong economy until that facade disappeared?

  • America divided by education. The gulf between the party identification of white voters with college degrees and those without is growing rapidly. Trump is widening it. One of the most striking patterns in yesterday’s election was years in the making: a major partisan divide between white voters with a college degree and those without one. According to exit polls, 61 percent of non-college-educated white voters cast their ballots for Republicans while just 45 percent of college-educated white voters did so. Meanwhile 53 percent of college-educated white voters cast their votes for Democrats compared with 37 percent of those without a degree. The diploma divide, as it’s often called, is not occurring across the electorate; it is primarily a phenomenon among white voters. It’s an unprecedented divide, and is in fact a complete departure from the diploma divide of the past. Non-college-educated white voters used to solidly belong to Democrats, and college-educated white voters to Republicans.


     

  • Covid grows less deadly as doctors gain practice, drugs improve. For those who develop dangerous cases of the infection, advances in medical care and the growing experience of doctors are improving the chances of survival. Since the first case arrived in the U.S. at the start of the year, medical professionals have gone from fumbling in the dark to better understanding which drugs work -- such as steroids and blood thinners, and the antiviral medicine remdesivir. Allocation of intensive medical resources have improved. And doctors have learned to hold off on the use of ventilators for some patients, unlike with many other severe respiratory illnesses. Governments are also learning lessons from Europe’s lockdowns and finding that they simply can’t lock down again.

  • Why we shouldn’t have unrealistic expectations regarding COVID-19 vaccines. Among pharmaceutical, medicinal and drug products, vaccines are by far the most complex. They are also life-saving. In times of devastating disease outbreaks such as the COVID-19 pandemic, it is not uncommon to foster hopes that an effective vaccine, a magic bullet, could somehow be quickly made and administered to people. Unfortunately, reality can be very different because vaccines can take a long time to be developed (4-5 years typically), longer than most pharmaceutical, medicinal or drug products. Bottom line: there may never be a magic bullet. We need to get better living with the virus. Furthermore trust in Covid-19 vaccines could turn on a knife edge. The race to remove regulatory and legal roadblocks to secure a vaccine could blow the whole vaccine hope wide open. Will you line up to take a vaccine which has been rushed through development without large scale patient trials from a vaccine maker that has been given full legal immunity from personal injury lawsuits?

  • 52% of young adults are living with their parents. That's higher than any prior measure on record, even surpassing the Great Depression's peak. Millennials will likely continue to pay the price for their parents’ luck and self-indulgence. According to a new report by Deutsche Bank the consequences of this dynamic will be so severe this widening generational divide should be a key source of alarm for investors, financial markets and society as a whole. “Investors can expect an abrupt, and significant upheaval in housing and asset markets, tax systems, climate policy, and many other areas,” Allen wrote. “This scenario becomes more likely towards the end of this decade as Millennial and younger voters start to exceed those in older generations.” (This year millennials have surpassed baby boomers as the country’s largest adult population.)

  • How China is preparing its economy for a future where the U.S. isn’t the center of global demand. In a world rocked by the coronavirus pandemic and tensions with the U.S., the Chinese government is stepping up focus on the domestic market with the pronouncement of a “dual circulation” policy. Increased public discussion in the last few weeks has helped crystallize some of the implications for global trade. “The ‘dual circulation’ policy demonstrates China’s recognition that it won’t be able to rely on trade as much for the next two decades, as it did for the previous two,” Stephen Olson, research fellow at the nonprofit Hinrich Foundation, said in an email this week. China is focused squarely on a post U.S.centric world in which China leads in technology innovation

  • Remote work is killing the hidden trillion dollar office economy. From airlines to Starbucks, a massive part of our economy hinges on white-collar workers returning to the office. As companies in cities across the U.S. postpone and even scrap plans to reopen their offices, they have transformed once-teeming city business districts into commercial ghost towns comprised of essentially vacant skyscrapers and upscale complexes. A result has been the paralysis of the rarely remarked-upon business ecosystem centering on white-collar workers, who, when you include the enterprises reliant on them, account for a pre-pandemic labor force approaching 100 million workers. 

  • Japanese doctor who lived to 105-his spartan diet, views on retirement, and other rare longevity tips1) Don’t retire. But if you must, do so a lot later than age 65, 2) Take the stairs (and keep your weight in check). 3) Find a purpose that keeps you busy. 4) Rules are stressful; try to relax them. 5) Remember that doctors can’t cure everything. 6) Find inspiration, joy and peace in art.

Our best wishes for a month filled with discovery and contentment,

Logos LP

Late-Capitalism and Gratitude

ryan-pernofski-MFlZ6NiJ1u0-unsplash.jpg

Good Morning,
 

Stocks fell sharply on Friday as gold spiked and the 30-year treasury bond yield hit an ALL-TIME low after the number of new coronavirus cases escalated, fueling worries over a pronounced global economic slowdown.

 

China’s National Health Commission reported more than 75,000 confirmed cases and over 2,000 deaths on the mainland. More than 800 new cases were reported in China overnight. South Korea has also reported more than 200 cases.

 

Meanwhile the service sector PMI reading hit its lowest level since 2013 while the S&P 500 forward PE ratio hit its highest level in nearly 18 years. That number is well above recent trends, eclipsing five, 10, 15 and 20-year averages while the bond market “screams” ever louder at the increasing disconnect between its outlook for the economy and that of the stock market, which has been signalling increased optimism for growth stocks. 


Our Take


Many pundits who remain constructive on the stock market have pointed a finger at the outbreak’s effects regarding the recent defensive rotation but there is likely more to it than a simple near-term hit to corporate earnings. Why? Well so far this year, utilities and bonds have BY FAR outperformed the broader market and the bond rally has been going on for some time now. 

 

Simply put, there are many conflicting signals out there. Besides the virus issue, many market participants view the present stock market as overpriced. The view from a technical basis seems to support this. Furthermore, since the October lows, the S&P has been trading in a range that is 9-11% above the 200-day moving average while sentiment indicators flash extreme greed and speculative trading among retail investors has pushed story stocks like Plug Power (NYSE:PLUG), Tesla (NYSE:TSLA) and Virgin Galactic (NYSE:SPCE) to eye watering heights. 

 

Credit conditions are loose, risk taking behaviour is high and capital is abundant; all “late cycle” market signs. Based on the above, many have posited that the market is now “overvalued” or uninvestable with even the eternal bull Warren Buffett in his latest annual letter, warning that debt should be used sparingly, current stock market valuations are “sky-high” and “anything can happen to stock prices tomorrow…[as occasionally]...there will be major drops in the market, perhaps of 50% magnitude or even greater”. Not exactly his usual light and airy bullishness... 

 

What to make of all of this? As always, market cycles present the investor with a daunting challenge given that:

 

-Their ups and downs are inevitable

-They will profoundly influence our performance as investors

-They’re unpredictable as to extent and, especially timing

 

On a short term basis, a “breather” was likely necessary given the overbought conditions coming into 2020, yet as for the medium to longer term outlook for stock ownership we believe that it is likely no longer possible to be “macro agnostic”. What does this mean? 

 

A hint can be found in Buffett’s recent letter cited above:  

 

If something close to current rates should prevail over the coming decades and if corporate tax rates remain near the low level businesses now enjoy, it is almost certain that equities will over time perform far better than long-term fixed-rate debt instruments.

 

If we deconstruct the long-term bullish thesis it is roughly that: 1) easy money conditions will continue with an accommodative Fed and a president that wants a roaring stock market at all costs 2) full employment conditions 3) high U.S. consumer and business confidence and 4) demographic tail-winds: ie. millennials that are reaching peak income who will fuel the next phase of growth in personal consumption prolonging the bull market cycle. 

 

Let’s focus on point 1 to illustrate what we mean regarding the impossibility of being macro agnostic. 

 

EPD Macro Research has provided an excellent analysis demonstrating that throughout history, the economic cycle has been a significant driver of asset class performance. The research points out that when economic growth is improving, stocks deliver strong returns, diminished volatility, and interest rates generally rise. As economic growth slips and moves into a downward trend, stocks generate muted returns with heightened volatility, while bond prices surge.

 

During the past two years, economic growth has undeniably weakened in the United States. Despite the material weakening of the US economy in the past year, BOTH stocks and bonds delivered returns that exceeded their historical average.

 

The strong performance in Treasury bonds is less of a surprise as declining growth is generally favorable for bond prices. Stocks over the past year and a half, however, have generated a risk-adjusted return nearly 3x the average ratio seen during periods of declining growth.

 

Treasury bonds have followed the economic cycle with impeccable precision, generating slightly stronger gains than past samples of "below trend" growth. Treasury bond investors have been rewarded for following the direction of growth.

 

As long as economic growth remains in a downward trend, history and the fundamentals of economics argue that Treasury bonds will continue delivering strong risk-adjusted returns relative to other more cyclical assets.

 

The question is why stocks have performed so abnormally given the weakening in economic growth? The answer is to be found in Buffett’s suggestion above RE: rates and corporate tax- in other words, pillar 1 of the bull thesis. 

 

Under the above framework, like it or not, the investor by allocating his portfolio cannot help but make an implicit decision about where he/she believes growth and interest rates (monetary policy) are going over the long term. Thus, investments in stocks under current conditions are explicitly and implicitly based on large sets of forecasts about the future. 

 

What can be gleaned from the above RE: putting new money to work today? 

 

First and foremost, equity investors should likely reduce their expectations for returns and especially so for individual stocks that have deviated not only in degree but also in direction, rising significantly during a period of declining growth. 

 

As long as economic growth remains in a downward trend, history and the fundamentals of economics suggest that Treasury bonds will continue delivering strong risk-adjusted returns relative to other more pro-cyclical assets.

 

Can we expect a statistically significant rebound in growth? Based on what we’ve seen, global growth indicators are likely to further slow this year with the impact of the Corona virus, taken together with slower growth in the labor force and the shift to services which continue to act as a drag on growth in the developed world. As such, we see rates continuing to go lower until further loosening of financial conditions and stimulus become politically untenable, or until such “financial engineering” loses its effectiveness due to diminishing returns. 

 

Does this mean the way forward is to sell stocks in order to buy bonds, cash equivalents and gold in drag? In this monetary environment, such a “boycott” of the equity markets would be unwise, yet until we see more convincing evidence of a cyclical upturn, reducing leverage, realizing outsized returns, tempering expectations for equity returns and preparing for big drops in the equity market (mean reversion) would be recommended. Macro-agnostic in this environment? We think not. 

Stock Ideas


Our piece on New Relic featured on ValueWalk.


Our new 1-1 coaching and advisory programs have launched. We help you build confidence in your understanding of the financial world in order to build a portfolio of assets that align with your financial goals.


Musings


On a lighter note, one thing I would also recommend in any market but perhaps even more so in this market, is the practice of gratitude. 

My mother sent me a simple thought provoking video about the subject recently.

At a time when the indignities and absurdities of our contemporary economy - with its yawning inequality, super-powered corporations, outsized returns, billionaires battling for the presidency, extreme narcissism and obsession with optimization and productivity - are more glaring than ever, it is important to reflect on how much we have to be grateful for. 

How lucky are we to be in a situation where we can drive our own cars, run our own businesses, send our kids to publicly funded schools, have enough to even discuss making a return on investment and of course have our basic needs met? At a time when consumer and business confidence is at record highs, and we have the luxury of protesting for higher wages, more benefits, the eradication of entire industries in the name of the planet, as well as more of anything and everything, it is so easy to overlook just how good we have it in developed countries. 
 

Let's remember that by having: 
 

  1. Food 

  2. A hot shower

  3. A job

  4. Lights that turn on at night

  5. Clean clothes on our backs

  6. A bed 

  7. A Floor in our homes that isn’t made of dirt

  8. Freedom from being shot at, raped or robbed

  9. Friends or family 

  10. Opportunity: we can turn things around and have a good life

We have more than most people on this earth. 

So the next time that feeling of frustration, anxiety or outrage washes over you, whether about the IRR on your project, the CAGR on your portfolio, the so called death of the American Dream, the amount of traffic/likes on your Linkedin/Instagram posts or whether or not you are getting your “fair share” of whatever pie you are concerned about, think about the inverse. 

What do you have to be grateful for today? What makes waking up in the morning a blessing instead of a curse? You may be surprised by the great abundance you find. 

 

As we navigate “Late-Capitalism” with its social, moral and ideological rot and wonder what comes next, I think much of the answer can be found in the practice of gratitude.  


Charts of the Month

Loan rates are making new new historical lows.

Screen Shot 2020-02-21 at 5.27.28 PM.png

Mortgage delinquencies are at record lows

Screen Shot 2020-02-22 at 8.48.19 PM.png

Thought of the Month


"Happiness cannot be traveled to, owned, earned, worn or consumed. Happiness is the spiritual experience of living every minute with love, grace, and gratitude.”- Denis Waitley



Articles and Ideas of Interest

 

  • The new generation of self-created utopias. As so-called intentional communities proliferate across the country, a subset of Americans is discovering the value of opting out of contemporary society. Rachel Fee, a 39-year-old herbalist, moved to Earthaven in 2017 after five years living outside Asheville, N.C. She wanted a more communal lifestyle that fit her ideals and didn’t push her to work relentlessly; here, she’s no longer “inundated with the idea that productivity is your self-worth,” she said. “This is not an idealistic situation,” she said. “It’s not running away from the world and sticking our head in the sand — it’s reinventing the wheel.” Interesting piece profiling such communities as well as their members citing academic studies done on such communities which have suggested that happiness levels within them are superior due to the fact that living in an intentional community, “appears to offer a life less in discord with the nature of being human compared to mainstream society.” Why? “One, social connections; two, sense of meaning; and three, closeness to nature.”

  • Are we alone? Something in space is sending radio bursts to Earth at regular intervals. Scientists are still debating what is creating the waves, which follow a steady 16-day cycle.

 

  • Why are there so few female CEOs? To become a company’s chief executive, it helps to have held a role with profit-and-loss responsibilities, such as heading a division or brand. Unfortunately women rarely land such positions, and more often end up heading human resources, administration, or legal. For the Wall Street Journal, Vanessa Fuhrmans examines the reasons for that, and highlights a company bucking the trend.

  • Stories Matter: CEOs who mention ‘growth’ on earnings calls see outsized stock gains. S&P Global Market Intelligence finds that CEOs who used buoyant language to describe revenue, earnings or profitability outperform counterparts. Russell 3000 executives who mentioned buzzwords like “growth” and “improvement” saw some of the most significant outperformance.The study represents the latest chapter in a long body of literature that seeks to determine how, if at all, executive commentary and guidance impacts returns.

  • An unsettling new theory: There is no swing voter. What if everything you think you know about politics is wrong? What if there aren’t really American swing voters—or not enough, anyway, to pick the next president? What if it doesn’t matter much who the Democratic nominee is? What if there is no such thing as “the center,” and the party in power can govern however it wants for two years, because the results of that first midterm are going to be bad regardless? What if the Democrats' big 41-seat midterm victory in 2018 didn’t happen because candidates focused on health care and kitchen-table issues, but simply because they were running against the party in the White House? What if the outcome in 2020 is pretty much foreordained, too?

  • Younger workers feel lonely at the office. They have friends at work and good relationships with their managers. But younger employees still feel alone at the office, according to a new survey. More than 80% of employed members of Generation Z—many of whom are just entering the workforce—and 69% of employed millennials are lonely, according to a survey of more than 10,400 people, including about 6,000 workers, in the U.S. from health insurer Cigna Corp.

     

  • Climate models are running red hot, and scientists don’t know why. The simulators used to forecast warming have suddenly started giving us less time.

  • Why China is still so susceptible to disease outbreaks? China has become an epicenter for disease outbreaks, and the problem lies in its food supply. 

  • We are only in the early innings of the enterprise cloud software revolution. Enterprise software is in the midst of a structural shift toward cloud-enabled platforms. In-house systems, localised IT teams, unsupported third-party software, and expensive solutions by incumbents present a major market share opportunity. The legacy moat attributed to customer stickiness and high switching costs has ended. We are now witnessing an inflection point, driven by several technology evolutions, which will reward new and innovative players.

  • By nearly every measure, the venture industry has boomed.Venture capital has evolved from small-scale, hyperlocal deals to a global industry that invests $250 billion each year. Quartz contributor Dave Edwards reports on the forces that transformed VC—and lays out what the explosion of private investment means for all of us.

  • If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich? How much is a child’s future success determined by innate intelligence? Economist James Heckman says it’s not what people think. He likes to ask educated non-scientists -- especially politicians and policy makers -- how much of the difference between people’s incomes can be tied to IQ. Most guess around 25 percent, even 50 percent, he says. But the data suggest a much smaller influence: about 1 or 2 percent. So if IQ is only a minor factor in success, what is it that separates the low earners from the high ones? Or, as the saying goes: If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich?

  • Inside the mind-bending world of political disinformation. Atlantic reporter McKay Coppins investigated pro-Trump propaganda on Facebook from the inside: Creating a fake profile and “liking” conservative-oriented pages quickly took him down the rabbit hole of how the US president’s re-election campaign combines microtargeting, sheer volume, and misleading content, among other tricks, to ignite his base and question the concept of truth.

Our best wishes for a fulfilling February,

Logos LP

Blind Spots, Power and Decision Making

Good Morning,
 

U.S. stocks steadied Friday after a three-day slide, while Treasury yields and the dollar edged lower. The week was largely dominated by crude’s tumble into bear market territory yet all three major American assets didn’t seem to care.

The S&P 500 Index finished the week virtually where it began, as rallies in health-care and tech shares offset a rout in energy producers. Small caps rallied Friday to end higher on the week.

Also of interest this week was Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc., buying a 38 percent stake in Home Capital for about C$400 million ($300 million) and providing a C$2 billion credit line to backstop the Toronto-based lender.

With the deal, the billionaire investor is wading into a housing market that’s been labeled overvalued and over-leveraged, with home prices in Toronto and Vancouver soaring as household debt hits record levels.

Warren Buffett’s deal to back Home Capital Group Inc. was quickly interpreted by Toronto real estate pundits as a vote of confidence for a housing market that everyone from investors to global ratings companies say is a bubble ready to burst. Nevertheless, before getting too jubilant about Canadian real estate one should consider the terms of the deal. 

Buffett is no stranger to taking advantage of dark times to opportunistically turn need into an attractive investment (famously investing $5 billion in Goldman Sachs right after the 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers). Securing Buffett’s participation came at a high price for the Canadian company, including giving Berkshire Hathaway a large stake at a steep discount to a recent trading average. Based on Friday’s closing price Buffett appears to have already have nearly doubled his initial $153 million investment in Home Capital’s equity, on paper...

A classic example of: “be greedy when others are fearful.”
 


Our Take

 

Weakness in energy prices were the theme of the week, yet few signs of contagion emerged leaving everything from gold to the dollar to U.S. equities to stay range bound as the traditionally slow summer season began.

As Bloomberg remarked, the bear market in crude in many ways resembles its more severe predecessors from 2014 and 2016: oil prices plummeting, non-U.S. producers floundering to keep supply at bay and concerns swirling around the impact of energy companies on high-yield bonds.

The correlation between daily swings in the S&P 500 Index and crude has been roughly zero in the past month, the lowest since January and far below the five-year highs reached in 2016 as the oil prices bottomed near $26 before staging a rebound.

Why? Perhaps the industry’s impact on the overall market is simply low. Today, energy stocks account for less than 6 percent of the S&P 500, compared with 11 percent three years ago. Or perhaps investors see little possibility of systemic risk.

One thing is evident: that falling energy prices will likely further subdue inflation.

Treasury yields have fallen from their 2017 highs recently, with the benchmark 10-year yield trading around 2.15 percent. In March, it traded around 2.6 percent. The bond market doesn't appear to see inflation coming in the near term, and so far it's been right.

The consumer price index fell 0.1 percent in May, raising questions about whether the Fed will be able to raise rates once more this year. The next rate hike isn't fully priced in until March 2018, according to the CME Group's FedWatch tool.

In addition, Amazon’s CEO Jeff Bezos may be single handedly killing inflation. As recently pointed out on CNBC, at a time when central banks are starting to prepare for an expected rise in inflation ahead, Bezos' move to acquire Whole Foods looks to be a significant counterweight.

The entire food retailing industry is an $800 billion market and it is likely that the the supermarket wars are only just beginning. Food makes up about 14.6 percent of the consumer price index, a widely used inflation index…

In addition, this move will likely put greater pressure on other chains such as Target and Wal-Mart to lower prices. Neil Irwin for the NY Times goes so far as to say that the Amazon-Walmart showdown has come to explain the modern economy as in the short term consumers will benefit from lower prices but in the long term will have worrying implications for jobs, wages and inequality.

Interestingly, few are following the Federal Reserve’s lead to raise interest rates. In fact, inflation appears to slowing worldwide and a broad measure of rich-world monetary conditions implied by Morgan Stanley, which incorporates short-term interest rates, bond yields, share prices and other variables suggests monetary policy is becoming looser, if anything…

In this environment further tightening presents asymmetric risk to the downside. Much better to let the economy run a bit hot and raise rates than exacerbate a deflationary environment...low inflation and thus low interest rates will likely remain the “only game in town”...

 

Musings
 

This week I read an interesting piece in the Atlantic which suggested that power causes brain damage. Many leaders actually lose mental capacities - most notably for reading other people - that were essential to their rise.

Is it perhaps useful to think of power as a prescription drug which comes with side effects? After 2 decades of lab research, Dacher Keltner, a psychology professor at UC Berkeley, found that subjects under the influence of power acted as if they had suffered a traumatic brain injury—becoming more impulsive, less risk-aware, and, crucially, less adept at seeing things from other people’s point of view.

Sukhvinder Obhi, a neuroscientist at McMaster University, in Ontario, recently described something similar.

When he put the heads of the powerful and the not-so-powerful under a transcranial-magnetic-stimulation machine, he found that power, in fact, impairs a specific neural process, “mirroring,” that may be a cornerstone of empathy.

Which gives a neurological basis to what Keltner has termed the “power paradox”: Once we have power, we lose some of the capacities we needed to gain it in the first place.

These findings are concerning as we look to those in our societies who have power including perhaps ourselves.

What blind spots has our power generated in ourselves and our leaders? Do these findings help to explain current political events and leadership styles? How much do they contribute to trends in income distribution, social stratification and investment returns?

What I found most interesting and perhaps most alarming about these findings is to set them in the context of another ill which society is currently suffering from: an inability to acknowledge error.

In a wonderful piece in The Economist a few weeks ago it was posited that humanity is getting worse at owning up to its gaffes.

Few enjoy the feeling of being outed for an error but real damage can be caused when the desire to avoid reckoning leads to a refusal to grapple with contrary evidence.

People often disregard information that conflicts with their view of the world. Why? Roland Bénabou, of Princeton, and Jean Tirole, of the Toulouse School of Economics posit that: “In many ways, beliefs are like other economic goods. People spend time and resources building them, and derive value from them. Some beliefs are like consumption goods: a passion for conservation can make its owner feel good, and is a public part of his identity, like fashion. Other beliefs provide value by shaping behaviour.

Because beliefs, however, are not simply tools for making good decisions, but are treasured in their own right, new information that challenges them is unwelcome. People often engage in “motivated reasoning” to manage such challenges. Mr Bénabou classifies this into three categories. “Strategic ignorance” is when a believer avoids information offering conflicting evidence. In “reality denial” troubling evidence is rationalised away: house-price bulls might conjure up fanciful theories for why prices should behave unusually, and supporters of a disgraced politician might invent conspiracies or blame fake news. And lastly, in “self-signalling”, the believer creates his own tools to interpret the facts in the way he wants: an unhealthy person, for example, might decide that going for a daily run proves he is well.”

These tendencies/biases linked to the desire to avoid acknowledging error are relatively harmless on a small scale but can cause major damage when they are widely shared or exhibited by those in power.

It is no wonder that motivated reasoning is a cognitive bias which better-educated people are especially prone. This takes us back to the research on how power can cause the brain to become more impulsive, less risk-aware, and, crucially, less adept at seeing things from other people’s point of views.

As investors, but more broadly as humans we would do well to recognize how these tendencies cross-pollinate and threaten to wreak havoc on our decision making and its outcomes.

Particularly as we accumulate success and thus power we become more vulnerable. Blinded by our own righteousness, increasingly unable to consider differing narratives, facts, perspectives, ideas and at times even reality.

What can be done to avoid these blind spots? Research finds that humility can go a long way to counter such tendencies. Yet to build humility, experiences of powerlessness may be key.

By experiencing or at minimum recounting moments of powerlessness, you maintain a connection or “groundedness” in reality.

When was the last time you felt powerless? The last time you made an error? Hold onto those moments. They may more important than you think.



Ideas from Logos LP

Huntington Ingalls Industries (NYSE: HII) 

 

Logos LP in the Media

Our 2016 Annual Letter to Shareholders Published by ValueWalk
 


Thought of the Week 

 

"It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows." -Epictetus
 


Articles and Ideas of Interest
 

  • My algorithm is better than yours.  Just 10% of trading is regular stock picking estimates JPMorgan. The majority of equity investors today don't buy or sell stocks based on stock specific fundamentals. No wonder the world’s fastest growing hedge funds are quant funds and robots are eating money managers lunches.

 

  • Finland tests a new form of welfare. An experiment on the effect of offering the unemployed an unconditional income. Interesting piece in The Economist chronicling Mr Jarvinen who was picked at random from Finland’s unemployed (10% of the workforce) to take part in a two-year pilot study to see how getting a basic income, rather than jobless benefits, might affect incentives in the labour market. He gets €560 ($624) a month unconditionally, so he can add to his earnings without losing any of it. Finland’s national welfare body will not contact him directly before 2019 to record results. I see this happening more often in the developed world. Something to keep an eye on.

 

  • Stop fooling yourself about 8% returns. Nice piece in Gadfly suggesting that There's an amazing amount of denial going on right now. Investors are simply ignoring current market dynamics and are still expecting average annual returns of 8.6 percent, according to a Legg Mason Inc. survey of income investors released this week. Those who were employed expected more than 9 percent gains, with retirees expecting less. Actual returns have come in markedly lower of late, but hopes remain high. It is important that investors become realistic. If they're not, fund managers will try to serve their hopes and dreams, making the financial system all the more fragile for it.

 

  • The web makes it harder to read market sentiment. The internet swept away the old-school financial pundits, turning the public forum into the Wild West. Inflammatory click bait filled with extreme opinions has found its way into ordinary discourse. Not too long ago, anyone who held radical opinions about markets, individual stocks (or even politics) could freely opine about them, just as today. But it was local and contained; those with idiosyncratic opinions could only scare their friends and neighbors, one at a time, at backyard BBQs and school plays. That is no longer the case as “crash”, “hyperinflation”, “monetary debasement” are becoming more common than “value investing”, “long-term” and “prudence” ;).

 

  • The cheapest generation. Why millennials aren’t buying cars or houses and what that means for the economy. Younger generations simply haven’t started spending yet….But what if this assumption is simply wrong? What if Millennials’ aversion to car-buying isn’t a temporary side effect of the recession, but part of a permanent generational shift in tastes and spending habits? It’s a question that applies not only to cars, but to several other traditional categories of big spending—most notably, housing. And its answer has large implications for the future shape of the economy—and for the speed of recovery. After all the old are eating the young. Around the world, a generational divide is worsening.

 

  • The older we get, the person we spend the most time with is the one we see in the mirror. QZ reports that time with friends, colleagues, siblings, and children diminishes over the course of a lifetime. One doesn’t have to be alone to be lonely. More than half of the lonely respondents in the UCSF study lived with a partner. To feel connected to others, it seems, the number of hours spent on relationships is less important than the quality of the relationship itself.

 

Our best wishes for a fulfilling week,  

Logos LP

Political Risk and "Expert" Bearishness

Good Morning,
 

Significant movement for U.S. stocks last Friday closing mixed due to pressure from this year's best-performing sector: technology.

                               

The Nasdaq composite hit a record high at the open before closing 1.8 percent lower. Shares of Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Netflix and Google-parent Alphabet all fell more than 3 percent.


The tech-heavy index also posted its worst weekly performance of the year. The S&P 500 closed 0.1 percent lower, erasing earlier gains, with information technology dropping more than 2.5 percent. Big tech was slammed as investors took profits from the group, which some fear has become a massive market bubble.

 

These concerns were bolstered by a report released by Goldman Sachs on the top five outperforming mega-cap names in tech with some warnings on valuations and concerns that their volatility has become extraordinarily low. In fact, the stocks had become closely correlated to safe haven plays, like bonds and utilities.

 

Meanwhile, the Dow Jones industrial average rose about 90 points, notching a record close as out of favor financials and industrials led.

 

Also this week we saw another unfortunate chapter of Donald Trump’s Presidency unfold. Hiding in plain sight in former FBI Director James Comey’s testimony Thursday before the Senate Intelligence Committee was a potentially major new avenue for special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russia-related crimes: the possibility that President Donald Trump committed a federal crime by lying to Comey about his connections to Russia and activities on his 2013 visit there.



Our Take
 

“Big tech” could be vulnerable in the near term as investors rotate into other groups that have lagged such as financials and energy yet the long-term earnings growth story remains intact. If anything this rotation is evidence of a healthy market alive to the issue of valuations supported by sound fundamentals (almost 40 percent of fund managers think that global equity markets are overvalued, the highest level since January of 2000. And 80 percent see U.S. markets as the most overvalued in the world).

Interestingly, looking back at the year 2000, all five companies have eight times more cash than the big tech stocks had in the bubble.

 

As for the Trump show, this week what became more clear is that the self-inflicted wounds of what appears to be an undisciplined presidency are increasingly likely to blow its chances of passing any of the anticipated economic stimulus measures. The trifecta of tax reform, repatriation and infrastructure investment could put the U.S. on very strong footing for the next several decades but this opportunity seems to be slipping away.

 

Barry Ritholtz in an interesting piece for Bloomberg, suggests that the president is becoming radioactive. He is having problems hiring outside counsel: four top law firms have reportedly turned him down. Resignations are mounting. Diplomats are revolting. Hundreds of key positions have gone unfilled as people increasingly perceive working for Trump as a career killer.

 

What now appears increasingly likely is not a dismantling of the Trump administration from the outside. But an implosion from within. Furthermore, although there may be no serious collusion with the Russians, there is now certain to be a wide-ranging independent investigation into all things Trump. This investigation will likely make governing even more difficult than it already is...

 

But, some may say, stocks are up, so how bad can it be? It’s true that while Wall Street has lost some of its initial excitement about Trumponomics the market is still sitting close to all time record highs as investors and businesses don’t seem to be pricing in the risk of disastrous policy.

 

Or aren’t they? Interestingly, in a recent research note put out by FactSet the initial excitement does not appear to be translating into stronger performance for most measures of the real economy so far in the first half of 2017. Even the initial surveys suggesting optimism have retreated somewhat as the equity markets have flattened out as progress on reforms has stalled in Washington D.C.

 

Business and consumer surveys initially reflected optimism, but we have seen small retreats in sentiment measures for both in the second quarter. *Note that the sentiment indicators may have pulled back recently, but they still remain elevated and near longer-term highs.

 

Perhaps the big money, which classically tends to equate wealth with virtue, is beginning to consider (even Ray Dalio is starting to break a sweat as Trump consistently chooses conflict over cooperation) the potential risks posed by this increasingly self-destructive Presidency….

 

Musings
 

On a not so unrelated topic, I came across two notable bearish "expert" perspectives on the American economy this week. Good old gurus Bill Gross, manager of the Janus Henderson Global Unconstrained Bond Fund, and Paul Singer, founder of hedge fund Elliott Management Corp. Speaking last week at the Bloomberg Invest New York summit on Wednesday.

 

They’re message: a crash is coming. Their argument: The Federal Reserve flooded the U.S. economy with cheap money after the 2008 financial crisis by holding interest rates near zero and beefing up its balance sheet. Corporations and individuals responded by bingeing on debt and risk assets -- as the Fed encouraged them to do so.

 

Now we’ve heard this argument many times before. In fact we’ve basically heard it every year since 2013. Should we be worried as these two investors are considered by many to be two of the greats having both superbly navigated the 2008 financial crisis?

 

There is no doubt that debt levels should be watched closely yet what is the data telling us?

As shown in the chart above, after over eight years, the nominal outstanding amount of U.S. consumer debt which includes mortgages eclipsed its $12.6 trillion peak from Q4 2008. While the $12.7 trillion current outstanding amount of consumer debt has made a new high, consumer debt has seen zero growth in the last nine years compared to a near doubling of debt in the five or so years that preceded the prior peak.

 

The consumer loan delinquency rate is at a 30 year low.

And this chart paints a positive picture of where the consumer stands regarding paying off their loans:

Nir Kaissar for Bloomberg reminds us that Gross's and Singer’s investment realms -- high-grade bonds and multistrategy hedge funds, respectively -- have been two the biggest laggards since the financial crisis. The S&P 500 has returned 18 percent annually from March 2009 through May, including dividends. By contrast, the HFRI Fund Weighted Composite Index -- a collection of various hedge fund strategies -- has returned 6.2 percent annually, and the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index has returned 4.2 percent annually.

 

Thus, a market meltdown would perhaps be the best thing that could happen to Gross and Singer. Should we therefore brush off such warnings?  

 

The answer is no. Although the consumer’s balance sheet appears to be healthy, vigilance is necessary as signs are now emerging in the credit markets that leverage is on the rise with a surge in corporate debt issuance that has steadily pushed investment-grade corporate leverage to a new peak for this cycle, as measured by debt-to-equity ratios. The ratio for companies in investment-grade indexes is around 2.8 times and 4.2 times for those on high-yield indexes.


Even though the ratios are near historic highs, market volatility as measured by the VIX is near a record low. Yes, the VIX is often criticized as a good measure of stock market volatility, but the divergence between leverage and VIX isn’t sustainable. We may be looking at a reversion to the mean as volatility is bound to pick up as investors and markets come to realize that low volatility and rising leverage may no longer be a suitable marriage.

 

Nevertheless, none of this suggests a 2008 style meltdown. What is likely is simply for the market to hang around its current level for years, waiting for earnings to catch up with stock prices as there are compelling reasons that companies will remain incredibly profitable for the foreseeable future. Thus, what vigilance in the face of such warnings should mean is what it has always meant to the prudent long term investor: buy right and hold on. You’re never going to get a perfect all-clear or get-out-now signal from the markets and this time is no different.



Logos LP Updates


May 2017 Return: 3.68%

2017 YTD (May) Return: 23.36%

Trailing Twelve Month Return: 31.01%

Annualized Returns Since Inception March 26, 2014: 28.471%

Cumulative Return Since Inception March 26, 2014: 92.53%


*All returns are reported unlevered


Thought of the Week

 

"Simplicity is not the goal. It is the by-product of a good idea and modest expectations.” -Paul Rand
 


Articles and Ideas of Interest
 

  • 6 Long-Term Economic and Investment Themes. Good list from Gary Shilling. 1) Huge fiscal stimulus, primarily infrastructure and military related 2) Globalization that shifted manufacturing from West to Asia is largely completed 3) Worldwide aging of populations 4) The long-promised Asian Century of global leadership is unlikely to come to pass due to the completion of globalization, the slow shift from export led domestic spending driven economies, government and cultural restraints, aging and falling populations 5) Disinflation with chronic deflation likely, especially as services follow goods in price retreats 6) The bond rally of a lifetime continues

 

  • Stop being positive and just cultivate neutrality for existential cool. Do we believe in the superiority of optimism? Culturally, we’re obsessed with positivity—our corporations measure worker glee, nations create happiness indices, and the media daily touts the health and social benefits of optimism. Thus, the good answer is to see the glass half full. Otherwise, you risk revealing a bad attitude. But are things so mutually exclusive? Is the glass not in a state of perpetual change? Can neutrality set us free? Can it help us see something more like the truth, what’s happening, instead of experiencing circumstances in relation to expectations and desires? The pressure to succeed—or to define success conventionally—can be subverted with neutrality. Things can go just so or totally awry once you understand that all things are fine, their upsides and downsides to be determined.

 

  • Mary Meeker’s 2017 internet trends report. In the most anticipated slide deck of the year Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers partner Mary Meeker looks at trends in digital and beyond. Of great interest is her coverage of interactive games as the motherlode of tech product innovation + modern learning (slides 113-150). Interesting concepts as we debate whether machines will replace most roles performed by humans. Such research supports that rising engagement in digital games is preparing us for the merger of man with machine.

 

  • Leverage: Gaining disproportionate strength. Wonderful explanation of the concept of leverage. Anyone who has ever haggled at a market or with a salesperson will understand the principle of using leverage in a negotiation. The trick is to declare their product or service to be so flawed and worthless that you are doing them a favor by buying it. Subsequently, the next step is usually to offer a low price which they counter with a slightly higher one that is still much lower than the asking price.

 

  • Passive investing is worse than...the misuse of antibiotics. The FT argues that the passive investment industry has become an oligopoly, with three large managers “drawing on seemingly limitless economies of scale” and amassing assets “simply by slashing costs” — both things, surely, that a blue-blooded capitalist would think is a sign of progress. Passive investing erodes competitive forces, because companies in the same sector end up with the same investor base and thus could pricing mechanisms break down?

 

  • Is the Canadian economy finally smooth sailing? Canada’s labor market continued surprising in May, with a greater-than-expected 54,500 jobs gain that also finally came with signs of a pick-up in wages. The employment gain -- the third biggest one-month increase in the past five years -- was driven by the addition of 77,000 new full-time jobs, which offset falling part-time employment. Economists had forecast a 15,000 increase in employment. The employment gains bode well for the continuation of the country’s expansion, which is the fastest among the Group of Seven, as Canada emerges from the oil price collapse and benefits from a soaring real estate market. It also could raise pressure on the Bank of Canada, which has been citing worries about slack in the economy for being cautious, to increase rates sooner. Certain funds are even becoming bullish on Canadian stocks seeing oil prices recovering. Nevertheless, it is doubtful that the bank of Canada will raise interest rates any time soon. Vulnerabilities remain. What should be watched closely is the impressive growth of Home Equity Lines Of Credit (HELOCs). A recent report from the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada explored this growth and found that “HELOCs offer relatively low interest rates and convenient access to large amounts of revolving credit, which may encourage some consumers to use their home equity to fund a lifestyle they cannot afford.” Keep an eye on the temperature of the market...

 

Our best wishes for a fulfilling week, 
 

Logos LP

Free Lunches and The Catch 22 of the Canadian Economy

Good Morning,

U.S. stocks finished near all-time highs Friday, Treasuries gained and oil closed in on $50 a barrel even after the world’s biggest economy reported its slowest pace of expansion in three years.

A large portion of those stock gains came this week. Stocks posted sharp rallies on Monday and Tuesday as corporate earnings season continued to reveal strong performances from some of the top companies in the world.

The Nasdaq 100 Stock Index added to its record level as Alphabet Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. rose after reporting strong earnings late Thursday.

Also of note was the Bureau of Labor Statistics employment cost index, which climbed 8 percent in the first quarter, its largest gain since 2007 and a sign that wage growth is accelerating. This builds on data from Europe showing higher than expected price growth in April.

 

Our Take

Overall, a soft report on U.S. Q1 GDP, but this number fits in with the seasonal pattern that has been common over the past few years, where Q1 has tended to be weak.

Markets continue to digest other concerns as President Donald Trump fights an uncertain legislative battle to make his promises a reality while tackling the North Korea issue. The administration’s tax-cut plan (which some believe the U.S. can afford) and mixed signals on its view of Nafta stirred markets this week leaving investors unsure of his position on either.

 As for the growth slowdown, investors will now question the Federal Reserve’s resolve to raise interest rates two more times this year.

What we are seeing is a market that is taking sides when it comes to the direction of the U.S. economy. In the green corner are stocks. The Standard & Poor’s 500 index is just 0.2 percent away from a record high reached in March on bets that Donald Trump’s administration will push through tax-code changes to spark growth. In the red corner sit U.S. government bonds, where benchmark 10-year Treasury yields have unwound almost half of their post-election increase, suggesting a far more pessimistic view the economy.

We still maintain that this earnings cycle is doing a good job of justifying these valuations despite the fact that economists such as Robert Shiller and other pundits view current valuations as dangerously high.

 Of note is economist Jeremy Siegal’s criticism that Shiller's "valuation statement takes no account of returns elsewhere in the asset markets, it takes no account of where interest rates are, where real estate are, where anything else is; it says there's one right price for equities, and the average from 1871 through, let's say, 2000 should be that average."

 

Musings
 

“He was going to live forever, or die in the attempt.” -Joseph Heller, Catch 22

The above quote goes a long way to describe the current state of the Canadian economy.

Canada’s economy unexpectedly stalled in February as manufacturing and production in other goods producing sectors shrank during the month. The real estate sector, which expanded 0.5 percent, had its best one-month gain since 2015 as housing in Toronto soared.

Canada’s housing sector, particularly in Toronto, has become both the main driver of growth and one of the biggest sources of uncertainty amid concern the gains aren’t sustainable.

To assuage angry voters struggling with unaffordability, the Federal and provincial governments have taken action to slow down the overheated housing markets around Toronto and Vancouver, but they may want to be careful not to overdo it.

That’s because the housing boom was pretty much the only thing holding up Canada’s economy in February.

Virtually all of the strength in February’s numbers comes from industries related to the housing boom — construction, finance and insurance, and real estate. Had it not been for strength in those areas, the economy would have shrunk in February.

This isn’t new. Many economists have raised the alarm about Canada’s increasing dependence on housing for its economic growth. Global banking consultancy Macquarie found last fall found that Canada’s reliance on real estate investment hit a record high last year — the same thing that happened in the U.S. shortly before its housing bubble burst.

It should not come as a surprise that Fitch, a leading U.S. Ratings agency just came out saying that the province’s 16-point plan to create affordability in the Greater Golden Horseshoe — an area home to nine million people and that wraps around the GTA in the southern end of the province — may derail the market.

This Catch 22 situation is becoming more and more common at the national level in our increasingly complex worldGovernments are expected to deliver all the benefits people want at no cost. In other words the electorate believes in the “free lunch”. The reality is that there is little a country can do in terms of policy actions to improve its situation that a) doesn’t have negative ramifications and b) will enhance the long-run outlook in the absence of fundamental improvement in economic efficiency.

Perhaps Canada and more specifically those who have disproportionately hung their hat on one asset class/one industry (blowups like Home Capital often occur at market peaks) will learn that there is simply no such thing as a “free lunch”

 

Logos LP 2017 Best Picks Update
 

Huntington Ingalls Industries (NYSE:HII): 9.07% YTD (ex dividend of 1.09%)

Huntington has only been public since 2012 but the company holds a virtual monopoly on the maintenance of U.S. naval and coast guard ships, giving it very high returns on capital with high growth. With a focus on military spending and a strong moat, we still find HII best in class among the aerospace and defence sector.

Cemex SAB de CV (ADR) (NYSE:CX): 14.82% YTD

This highly cyclical company is entering into a perfect storm of strong growth and a beaten down valuation. With a price to sales of 0.3, PE ratio at around 12 and free cash flow growth north of 87% over the previous year, the company has been growing revenue from high single digits to low double digits over the past 2 years while experiencing strong returns on capital. These returns are no surprise given the increased demand in construction and infrastructure spending. We expect this trend to continue for the next few quarters at least.

AAON (NASDAQ:AAON): 10.89% YTD (ex dividend of 0.64%)

With a 10 year average ROIC near 20% with no debt, Aaon is set to face a record year in addition to the infrastructure and housing tailwinds that are occurring in 2017. The company trades at a premium due to its impressive qualities and can be volatile due to the nature of infrastructure and maintenance for major complexes. With low inflation and steady demand for housing and construction, we expect the company to continue to perform well this year.

Syntel (NASDAQ:SYNT): -11.02% YTD

With tight control by executive management (only a minority float on the exchange) this turnaround story has incurred drastic losses due to repatriation and slowing revenue growth. However, historical ROIC has been at least 22% going back ten previous years and in light of their restructuring in the highly sticky IT outsourcing market, there is an excellent opportunity for a turnaround in a stock trading at very depressed valuations.


Thought of the Week
 

"The Texan turned out to be good natured, generous, and likeable. In three days no one could stand him.” -Joseph Heller, Catch 22
 

Articles and Ideas of Interest
 

  • I’ve worked in foreign aid for 50 years-Trump is right to end it, even if his reasons are wrong. Interesting perspective in Quartz from someone who has worked in foreign aid for over fifty years, in over 60 developing countries in Africa, Latin America, and Asia. Tom asks what if we are not even that sincere about doing good? What if we are in the aid business to make sure our own piece of the pie keeps growing? Should we end the “aid-industrial complex”?

 

  • What is meditation and how is it practicedNice overview including graphics for those interested in meditation. What are the styles, postures, objects of concentration, common hindrances and effects of practice?

 

  • The happiness experiment. Quartz launches a project focussed on exploring the concept of happiness and the human obsession with it. How to find it, how to keep it and how to define it. They examine happiness from the perspective of economics, history and evolutionary psychology to understand how our notion of happiness has changed over time.

 

  • An anatomy of “Modern Love”. Emma Pierson and Alex Albright analyzed every “Modern Love” column from The New York Times for a decade and found that the messy process of dating leads to the best stories. Here’s what else they learned.

 

  • The benefits of solitude. Our society rewards social behaviour while ignoring the positive effects of time spent alone. What really happens when we turn too often toward society and away from the salt-smacking air of the seaside or our prickling intuition of unseen movements in a darkening forest? Do we really dismantle parts of our better selves? A growing body of research suggests exactly that.

 

  • America is regressing into a developing nation for most peopleA new book by economist Peter Temin finds that the U.S. is no longer one country, but dividing into two separate economic and political worlds. In the Lewis model of a dual economy, much of the low-wage sector has little influence over public policy. Check. The high-income sector will keep wages down in the other sector to provide cheap labor for its businesses. Check. Social control is used to keep the low-wage sector from challenging the policies favored by the high-income sector. Mass incarceration - check. The primary goal of the richest members of the high-income sector is to lower taxes. Check. Social and economic mobility is low. Check.

 

Our best wishes for a fulfilling week,  

Logos LP