Newsletter

Silence Is Strength

Good Morning,

Could the “trump trade” have hit a major turning point this week?

U.S. stocks fell the most since the week leading up to the U.S. election as President Donald Trump suffered a major setback when he was forced to pull his health-care bill from a vote amid dissent among congressional Republicans.

Both conservatives and moderates opposed the bill even after Trump met personally with many lawmakers and traveled to Capitol Hill on Tuesday to address House Republicans. The setback also cast doubt on the president’s ability to shepherd other parts of his agenda, including promised tax cuts and regulatory reform, through Congress.

Tuesday saw the biggest drop in stocks since October and financial stocks were the biggest laggards this week, as the group lost 3.8 percent as investors turned to bonds as U.S. Treasuries rallied for the second week.

 

Our Take

Largely lost in the headlines about stocks at records before the selloff is the fact that the advance has been led by just a handful of large, mostly technology companies (think Apple, Amazon, Google and Facebook), while the shares of smaller companies are actually down for the year. This is simply “bad breadth”.

The divergence should be watched as smaller companies generally get a greater portion of their revenue from domestic sales and ideally would benefit the most from the Donald Trump administration's policies. Yes, small companies' shares did outperform last year, but their recent performance may be a sign that this year's rally wasn't built on a solid foundation.

As for the political fiasco, Barry Ritholtz reminds us that whether you support Trump or not, his combination of a corporate tax overhaul, repatriation of overseas profits and individual tax breaks could be a powerful cocktail.

The problem is that this week’s bumbling suggests an inability to govern. As we approach the 100-day mark, the promised pivot toward becoming “presidential” has yet to be seen. Instead, we see the entire economic agenda -- much of which was supported by those on both sides of the aisle -- now in danger.

It doesn’t help that Trump is now beginning to suffer from a credibility crisis as his near pathological and cavalier disregard for truth is catching up with him...In an exclusive interview with TIME magazine on Thursday Trump explained that it is okay to say something false as long as it later turns out that something vaguely similar is true. To end the interview he stated his rationale for anything he does: “I can’t be doing so badly, because I’m president, and you’re not. You know.”


Musings

I didn’t write last week as I felt that some silence was needed. A conscious effort to seek calm and relaxation. An opportunity to get beyond the noise.

I think as we age we come to realize the benefits of tuning in to the needs of our minds and bodies. I’m not talking about what we we believe we need from our external worlds. I’m talking about what we need from our internal worlds. The worlds that hold us together. That keep us whole. That keep us grounded and compose the fabric of our very existence. 

It is this world that has been a special focus of mine over the last 2 weeks. This is about cultivating a disciplined practice for managing information flow and creating periods of deep silence.

Why?

Recent studies are showing that taking time for silence restores the nervous system, helps sustain energy, and conditions our minds to be more adaptive and responsive to the complex environments in which so many of us now live, work, and lead.

Duke Medical School’s Imke Kirste recently found that silence is associated with the development of new cells in the hippocampus, the key brain region associated with learning and memory. Physician Luciano Bernardi found that two-minutes of silence inserted between musical pieces proved more stabilizing to cardiovascular and respiratory systems than even the music categorized as “relaxing.” And a 2013 study in the Journal of Environmental Psychology, based on a survey of 43,000 workers, concluded that the disadvantages of noise and distraction associated with open office plans outweighed anticipated, but still unproven, benefits like increasing morale and productivity boosts from unplanned interactions.

But purposeful silence isn’t just about blocking out others. It is about quieting inner noise. It is about taking a break from life’s most basic yet often most burdensome responsibility: having to decide or think of what to say.

Hal Gregersen writes in a recent HBR article, that silence “increase[s] your chances of encountering novel ideas and information and discerning weak signals.” When we’re constantly fixated on the verbal agenda—what to say next, what to write next, what to tweet next—it’s tough to make room for truly different perspectives or radically new ideas. It’s hard to drop into deeper modes of listening and attention. And it’s in those deeper modes of attention that truly novel ideas are found.

I didn’t have any ground breaking ideas over the last 2 weeks during my focus on silence yet that isn’t the point. The point is to allow yourself some mental and spiritual space that is agenda free. That is boundless. So perhaps this week you may want to ask yourself what you are doing to cultivate periods of sustained quiet time? Believe me, the email, the meeting, the media and the rebuttal can wait….


Logos LP News

This week, at a private event we presented some of our research entitled: "A top indicator for investing in growth or turnaround stocks"

Please contact us if you would like a copy of the presentation which included several stock specific case studies and picks.

 

Thought of the Week
 

"Silence is a source of great strength.”-Lao Tzu


Stories and Ideas of Interest

 

  • The biggest threat facing middle aged men isn’t smoking or obesity. It’s loneliness. Interesting piece suggesting that those who fall into the categories of loneliness, isolation, or even simply living on their own see their risk of premature death rise 26 to 32 percent. No wonder that “deaths of despair” are surging among the white working class. Perhaps not a coincidence that hedge fund king Ray Dalio published a long winded piece this week describing the phenomenon he sees as shaping economic conditions: populism.

     

  • Waking up from the American dream. The US’s wealth, high standards of living, and world-class services make it one of the best countries to live in—for some. But on UN sustainability goals in areas like healthcare, education, and violence, it scores dismally, Annalisa Merelli finds. Not a pretty picture. In addition, this week more disturbing data came out of the US suggesting that things are not as solid as they may seem: Car loans on the US have hit record levels and delinquencies are rising fast and private label mortgage bonds are rising from the grave...

 

  • Many are afraid of automation eliminating jobs but so far only one us occupation has been eliminated. Though almost all of today’s jobs have some aspect that can be automated by current technology, very few jobs can be entirely automated, according to a recent McKinsey analysis. “This distinction is important because it implies very different economic outcomes,” Bessen wrote in a column last year. “If a job is completely automated, then automation necessarily reduces employment. But if a job is only partially automated, employment might actually increase.” Anyway, Google’s chief futurist Ray Kurzweil thinks we could start living forever by 2029.

 

  • Why are employees at Google, Apple, Netflix and Dell more productive?  According to research from the leadership consulting firm Bain & Company, you might think that it’s because these companies attract top-tier employees–high performers who are naturally gifted at productivity–but that’s not the case, says Bain & Company partner Michael Mankins. How? Grouping A players together instead of spreading them out, cutting down bureaucracy and ensuring that leaders are inspirational.

 

  • Start-ups shouldn’t be unicorns they should be zebras. Quartz suggests developing alternative business models to the startup status quo has become a central moral challenge of our time. These alternative models will balance profit and purpose, champion democracy, and put a premium on sharing power and resources. Companies that create a more just and responsible society will hear, help, and heal the customers and communities they serve. Interesting outline of what a zebra company looks like and the barriers facing founders who focus on sustainable prosperity.

 

  • Can’t tax won’t tax. The hole in western finances. There is a persistent shortfall between revenues and spending and it may get worse. This is a timely piece from the Economist as Trump eyes a tax cut and Trudeau released his “placeholder” budget this week which did not include any significant tax increases. This does not surprise me. The average voter has no understanding of the bind western governments find themselves in. “The fundamental problem is that OECD populations are getting older, which implies a steadyincrease in spending on health and pensions. That will make it very hard to bring overall spending down. Meanwhile the proportion of the population that is of working age is set to decline—not good for tax revenues. Governments could raise taxes but we live in an era of mobile people and companies. Governments are competing to reduce corporation tax rates to attract multinationals and highly skilled workers. And as we have seen, there is no political will to raise taxes. This suggests there is a structural problem. At the moment, the problem is not hitting home because of low rates. But imagine if today's debt levels were accompanied by 2000's yield levels; then interest payments would be 4.5% of GDP, more than double today's levels. And that of course would only make the financing problems even harder.”

 

All the best for a productive week,


Logos LP

Why You Shouldn't Sell Everything

Good Morning,
 

U.S. equities rose in choppy trade Friday following a strong jobs report, while investors were already looking ahead to a Federal Reserve meeting next week.

Signs of strong growth in the economy weren’t enough to propel stocks higher this week as investors weighed the impact of a potential interest-rate increase by the Federal Reserve next Wednesday. Futures traders now see a hike as a sure thing. According to the CME Group's FedWatch tool, market expectations for a March rate hike stood at 93 percent.

With the first-quarter earnings season almost over, stocks lost the boost provided by profits that on average beat Wall Street expectations.

In U.S. economic news, 235,000 jobs were added in February, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said, adding the unemployment rate ticked lower to 4.7 percent.

In Canadian economic news, Canada’s labour market continued its rally into February, bringing the unemployment rate to the lowest in more than two years, but with continued signs of sluggish wage increases.

Canada added 15,300 jobs in February, and employment has increased by 288,100 over the past 12 months, Statistics Canada reported today in Ottawa.

The quality of the job picture was also better than what was thought only a month ago, with an improved mix of full-time and part-time jobs. The full-time gain in February was the biggest since May 2006.

 

Our Take
 

The US Jobs report was solid and the labor force participation rate finally ticked up. If the fed was looking for further confirmation from the labor market it got it. Yet interestingly U.S. Treasury yields and the dollar turned lower after the report came out, with some investors disappointed with the hourly wage growth last month. Hourly wages rose at an annualized rate of 2.8 percent, the BLS said.

Also the average hourly earnings were a bit disappointing yet as we have said before expectations are sky high and any choke is immediately reflected in markets. What will come next as a major test for market strength is the break-down in crude oil prices. For most of this year, we’ve managed to ignore rising inventories for crude and refined products while speculators were record long.

Oil posted its worst weekly decline since November as a Bloomberg Commodity Index dropped 3.4 percent for its fourth straight weekly loss. Energy companies slid 2.6 percent as nine of the 11 main industry groups in the S&P 500 retreated.

On the Canadian side, this was also a good jobs report which takes the likelihood of a Bank of Canada interest rate cut off the table yet we believe the central bank is also unlikely to raise rates anytime soon as the economy still has a ways to go given its dependency upon real estate and its weak business investment.

Non-residential business investment has fallen in eight of the past nine quarters, and is down 19 percent over that time.

The two-year decline is the biggest since at least 1981, when the current GDP data set begins. Older data sets aren’t comparable, but can be indicative, and they show the drop may be the biggest since the 1950s.

Investment in machinery and equipment now represents 3.7 percent of GDP. That’s the lowest share of the economy since at least 1981, possibly in the post-World War II era.

Musings

 

I keep hearing from people that they sold their stocks because “the market is getting expensive” or “there just has to be a crash coming” or “things are getting frothy” or “this run has only been because of monetary policies put in place by the Federal Reserve.” They ask me whether we are trimming winners or at least getting more defensive.

I’ve grown tired of explaining the same thing over and over again Read About Businesses, Not Stock Market Predictions! 

Yet I came across something presented by Jim Cramer from CNBC this week that I found quite relevant to this discussion and which goes quite far to illustrate this point.

Cramer also suffers from the same malaise and thus took a look at the top 9 performing stocks since the bottom of the market on March 10, 2009 to signal the end of the market's free-fall and challenged anyone to argue that these companies need the Fed to fuel their stock rallies:

No. 1 Incyte Corporation: This is a biopharma company with a pioneering immunotherapy play that is up a staggering 6,543%


No. 2 United Rentals: Up 4,002% in the last eight years.

 
No. 3 Regeneron: This biotech company created a drug called Eylea to treat age-related macular degeneration with a once-a-month injection in the eye that was much better than the alternative of once a week. The stock has now rallied 2,975% since the market's bottom.


No. 4 Alaska Air Group: Known as a niche company that knows its market well. A 2,631% gain.


No. 5 Wyndham Worldwide: The stock had 178 million shares at the Haines bottom and now has 108 million. Talk about a buyback!

                                                   
No. 6 Netflix: Janet Yellen Not a bad at a 2,451% gain.

                                                   
No. 7 American Airlines: This company managed to come out of bankruptcy and become a top performer. Cramer gave some of the credit to the government for its 2,133% rally because regulators did allow major airlines to merge.

                                                   
No. 8 Priceline: You won't find anything in the Fed minutes about creating Priceline. The success of its business model was pure innovation, and what travelers were looking for. The stock is up 2,125%.

                                                   
No. 9 CBS: Cramer attributed the terrific job of CEO Les Moonves for excellent programming and disciplined cash management for the stocks 2,101%.
 

As comparisons: 

A rough estimate of the appreciation of a Toronto home since March 10, 2009 = 150%

The S&P 500 since March 10, 2009 = 247%

 

Now to be fair these are indexes and I’m sure you could find homes that have appreciated more or less yet the point is that these kind of colossal returns (20x or more on your money in roughly 8 years) are specific to businesses. They are specific to outstanding capital allocation and management not to the Fed or to “THE MARKET”.

Another interesting note regarding the “stocks are expensive time to sell because a crash is surely around the corner” camp comes from John Huber a fellow value investor who conducted a great study looking at roughly 189 years of stock market returns.

What he found was interesting:

  • The market had 134 positive years and 55 negative years (the market was up 71% of the time)

  • 44% of the time the market finished the year between 0% and +20%

  • 60% of the time the market finished the year between -10% and +20%

  • Only 14% of the time (26 out of 189 years) did the market finish worse than -10%

  • Only a mere 4.8% of the time (fewer than 1 in 20 years) did the market finish worse than -20%

So to put it another way (using the 189 years between 1825 and 2013 as our sample space), there is an 86% chance that the market finishes the year better than -10%. There is a 95% chance the market ends higher than -20%. And as I mentioned above, there is a 71% chance that the market ends any given year in positive territory.

One last observation: the market was 5 times more likely to be up 20% or more in a year (50 out of 189) than down 20% or more in a year (9 out of 189)!

Although certain to happen again, crashes are rare. The 2008 type scenarios, are extremely rare. Only 3 times since 1825 did the market finish a calendar year down 30% or worse. That’s about once every 63 years. I can’t emphasize this enough to the market timers out there. People tend to overestimate the probability of a market crash when one recently occurred.

The storm clouds of 2008 are in the rear view mirror, but they are still visible, and the effects of the storm still evident so before you pay too much attention to the headlines and sell everything or even sell anything, look at the businesses you own and bear in mind the above statistics...

 

Thought of the Week
 

"If you do what everyone else does, you will get what everyone else gets." -Stephen Richards


Stories and Ideas of Interest

 

  • Credit Suisse says the $1.5 trillion of cash on large cap company balance sheets is obscuring profitability and distorting valuations by making companies seem more expensive than they really are. It estimates that, ex-cash, stocks are trading near their historical averages. For example, at a current 18.6 forward P/E multiple, the S&P 500 is trading 13% above its 10-year average because of historic cash levels. Interesting point. Important to remember that a high P/E ratio can point to overpriced stocks, but it can be caused by high cash balances and low debt ratios.

     

  • A little can go a long way. When thinking about their financial situation, most people spend way more time thinking about investing than they do about spending and saving. Michael Batnick shows that it should be the exact opposite, because saving and spending is something we have complete control over. We can’t know if our portfolio will be up or down next year, but we can decide whether or not to take that $5,000 vacation. Saving to invest in ALMOST ANY VANILLA STOCKS SUCH THOSE IN A LOW COST ETF should be the priority rather than trying to figure out the perfect portfolio or avoid the next crash.

 

  • Big tobacco has caught startup fever. Something we have been watching for a bit as big tobacco may be entering into a renaissance of sorts. It’s not smoking. It’s platform-agnostic nicotine delivery solutions. Interesting story in Bloomberg highlighting how big tobacco is entering into an innovation war.

 

  • A world without wifi looks possible as unlimited plans rise. The Wi-Fi icon -- a dot with radio waves radiating outward -- glows on nearly every internet-connected device, from the iPhone to thermostats to TVs. But it’s starting to fade from the limelight. With every major U.S. wireless carrier now offering unlimited data plans, consumers don’t need to log on to a Wi-Fi network to avoid costly overage charges anymore. That’s a critical change that threatens to render Wi-Fi obsolete. And with new competitive technologies crowding in, the future looks even dimmer.

 

  • Robert Mercer: The big data billionaire waging war on mainstream media. With links to Donald Trump, Steve Bannon and Nigel Farage, the rightwing computer scientist is at the heart of a multi-million dollar propaganda network. This is a must read. Welcome to the future of journalism in the age of platform capitalism. News organisations have to do a better job of creating new financial models. But in the gaps in between, a determined plutocrat and a brilliant media strategist can, and have, found a way to mould journalism to their own ends.

 

  • Moral outrage is self-serving, say psychologists. When people publicly rage about perceived injustices that don't affect them personally, we tend to assume this expression is rooted in altruism—a "disinterested and selfless concern for the well-being of others." But new research suggests that professing such third-party concern—what social scientists refer to as "moral outrage"—is often a function of self-interest, wielded to assuage feelings of personal culpability for societal harms or reinforce (to the self and others) one's own status as a Very Good Person.

 

  • What do Uber, Volkswagen and Zenefits have in common? They all used hidden code to break the law. Coding is a superpower. With it, you can bend reality to your will. You can make the world a better place. Or you can destroy it.

 

  • How to be good at anything according to a world expert on peak performance. There is an important difference between practice and deliberate practice...

 

All the best for a productive week,


Logos LP

Warren Buffett Is Right

Good Morning,
 

Stocks posted weekly gains Friday, while Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen suggested that she may raise rates this month.

 

While leaving just enough wiggle room in case conditions should change, Yellen said Friday that economic improvements of late will be a big part of the discussion at the March 14-15 Federal Open Market Committee meeting.

 

Recently, a slew of top Fed officials indicated that tighter monetary policy may be coming soon.  Market expectations for a March rate hike have skyrocketed to 81 percent, according to the CME Group's FedWatch tool, on the back of hawkish rhetoric and solid economic data.

 

The market has an excellent track record for predicting rate increases and will most likely get this one right.

 

Furthermore, markets seem to be applauding a raise as stocks have risen to record levels since the U.S. election fueled by expectations of tax reform, deregulation and government spending. The three major indexes posted their best day of 2017 on Wednesday, notching fresh record highs as global stock markets have also been rallying.

 

Donald Trump delivered his debut address to Congress this week which although quite “Presidential” was light on policy detail and big on rhetoric.

 

Trump restated his key campaign themes, issuing a rallying call for the "renewal of the America spirit." Wall Street will have to keep waiting on specifics of the plans for tax cuts, infrastructure investment and regulatory reform that have helped drive a global rally since the November election.

 

SnapChat’s IPO was a resounding success this week. As stated before we would certainly not be buyers but the 44% surge on open is a bullish sign for the overall market. Interestingly, a high school in Mountain View, California, made millions from the IPO less than four years after investing $15,000 in the company. They cashed out 24 million…..

 

Nevertheless, a declining user base and a lacklustre monetization plan suggest a "greater fool theory" in which the stock's price is determined by irrational expectations.

 

No wonder S3 Partners LLC, a financial analytics firm, says short interest in the photo-app maker is liable to reach $1 billion within a week, particularly if the rally continues. The contrary bet won’t be cheap, either, with the cost to borrow shares likely to start at 25 percent and rise.

 

“We expect that 10 percent to 20 percent of the initial offering will be shorted in the first week of trading, which roughly translates into $500 million to $1 billion of short interest right from the start”

 

Let’s not forget that Twitter surged over 70% at open from IPO price. That investment hasn’t seemed to have worked so well...

 

Musings
 

Warren Buffett sent his annual letter to shareholders this week and took questions on CNBC for 3 hours.  Along with more prosaic investment suggestions, the head of Berkshire Hathaway offered advice on how to leverage fear.

 

He also praised the US’s “miraculous” economic achievements and the country’s “tide of talented and ambitious immigrants”. He railed against asset managers and suggested investors should utilize low cost ETFs. He  also suggested that there is simply no other better long-term investment than in the common stock of high quality businesses.

 

He even went so far as to say that  "Measured against interest rates, stocks actually are on the cheap side compared to historic valuations,"

 

"But the risk always is interest rates go up, and that brings stocks down.” He also stated that he had invested about $20 billion in stocks since shortly before the election.

 

"If interest rates were at 7 or 8%, then these prices would look exceptionally high," Buffett said. The Federal Reserve most recently raised its benchmark rate in December, to a range of 0.50% to 0.75%.

 

Although we tend to avoid making any type of suggestion as to the valuation of the  “overall market” and choose to focus on individual businesses, we would tend to agree with Buffett’s suggestion. We would also agree with this statement he made in his interview:

 

When asked: "Wait, it's too late for me to get in. I've missed it. We're past Dow 20k, now I have to wait for the pullback." What would you say to someone like that?                       

Buffett: Well, I would say they don't know, and I don't know. And if there's a game it's very good to be in for the rest of your life, the idea to stay out of it because you think you know when to enter it-- is a terrible mistake.

 

I must say buffett’s comments were a breath of fresh air in what has been the most hated bull market of all time. Investor pessimism is soaring and everyone is unhappy:

 

"Money managers are unhappy because the majority of them are lagging the S&P 500 and see the end of another quarter approaching."

 

"Economists are unhappy because they do not know what to believe. This month's forecast of a strong economy or the ramblings of the disenchanted telling them all is not well. They ponder and are vexed when looking at the pros and cons of any proposed changes by the current administration."

 

"Technicians are unhappy because the market refuses to correct."

 

"Investors are unhappy because they are nervous over the bombardment of political ramifications to economic policies that are unknown. They fear new highs as if it were a disease as they are constantly reminded by the skeptics that they could give it all back".

 

"The public is unhappy because they can't figure out what is going on. The political stage says one thing but the stock market is saying another. They sit frozen in place and wring their hands wondering if the stock market can really go higher."

 

"The skeptics are unhappy because everything tells them to be wary of the market, yet the rising indexes continues to prove them wrong time after time."

 

As one market participant astutely observed, the ONLY people that are in the pilot's seat are those that have participated in this historic bull market. Which seat are you in?


Thought of the Week
 

"Our expectation is that investment gains will continue to be substantial – though totally random as to timing – and that these will supply significant funds for business purchases," -Warren Buffett



Stories and Ideas of Interest

 

  • The Singularity will happen within 30 years. Softbank’s CEO says by then a single computer chip will have an IQ of 10,000  and your shoes will have a higher IQ than you. Hurray for progress!

     

  • Netflix is thinking about how to entertain AIs. In 50 years, CEO Reed Hastings isn’t sure if his customers will even be human. At a certain point, when algorithms designed to represent our behavior are dictating our consumption, the real-life viewer—you—might start to get lost. That could be what Hastings is driving at here, as Inverse pointed out. Would entertainment be tailored to the person, then, or to the AI?

 

  • The need for exponential growth kills innovation. Silicon Valley’s obsession with it is damaging a generation of startups. It used to be that successful, upcoming companies would show a prudent mix of present-day profits and future prospects, but such a mix is now considered old-fashioned and best forgotten. Now it’s all potential, all the time.

 

  • Scraping by on six figures? Tech workers feel poor in Silicon Valley's wealth bubble. Big tech companies pay some of the country’s best salaries. But workers claim the high cost of living in the Bay Area has them feeling financially strained. A tech worker, enrolled in a coding bootcamp, described how he lived with 12 other engineers in a two-bedroom apartment rented via Airbnb. “It was $1,100 for a fucking bunk bed and five people in the same room. One guy was living in a closet, paying $1,400 for a ‘private room’.” “We make over $1m between us, but we can’t afford a house,” said a woman in her 50s who works in digital marketing for a major telecoms corporation, while her partner works as an engineer at a digital media company. “This is part of where the American dream is not working out here.”

 

  • Every successful relationship is successful for the exact same reasons. One man set out to create the definitive guide to a long and happy relationship by interviewing people that have been married for at least 10 years. The response was overwhelming. Almost 1,500 people replied, many of whom sent in responses measured in pages, not paragraphs. It took almost two weeks to comb through them all, but he did it. And what he found stunned him…They were incredibly repetitive. This is a great guide. Check out all definitive 13 principles and remember:  “What I can tell you is the #1 thing, most important above all else is respect. It’s not sexual attraction, looks, shared goals, religion or lack of, nor is it love. There are times when you won’t feel love for your partner. That is the truth. But you never want to lose respect for your partner. Once you lose respect you will never get it back.”

 

All the best for a productive week,


Logos LP

Can These Science Concepts Help Us Understand This Market?

Good Morning,

 

U.S. equities closed flat to higher Friday, taking a bit of a breather from their most recent record run, while investors awaited President Donald Trump's speech to Congress next week.

 

Nevertheless, stocks rallied in the last half-hour of trading Friday to recover losses from earlier in the session. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, which closed up 0.05 percent, has now hit daily highs for 11 consecutive sessions, its longest streak of records since 1987. The S&P 500 Index and Nasdaq Composite Index also finished higher, while the Russell 2000 Index lost ground.


On the local front, the TSX had a no good very bad day on Friday as earnings and dividend disappointments among gold companies, along with weakening oil prices and trepidation over President Donald Trump’s border tax proposals, erased two-thirds of this year’s rally. Not to mention the fact that growth is disappointing, Trudeau has run out of fiscal runway and inflation is higher than it has been in 2 years...

 

Our Take

 

Amidst the growing stock market euphoria it should be noted that gold rose for a fourth week after U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said Thursday that he expects low borrowing costs to persist, sparking a drop in the dollar.

 

The bond market also seems to be at odds with the bullishness of the stock market as the benchmark 10-year note yield fell to 2.33 percent, while the two-year note yield declined to 1.15 percent. We would caution that it appears like bonds could have it right — that growth is coming, but probably not as quickly as the stock market would like to think.

 

The S&P 500 is up more than 10 percent since Trump's Nov. 8 victory, rising on the election, trading flat through much of December, then jumping again in the new year. The yield on the benchmark 10-year note immediately spiked as well, surging 38 percent to 2.6 percent by mid-December.           

                                           

However, the yield, generally seen as a proxy for GDP growth plus the inflation rate, has fallen somewhat since then as fixed income investors have continued to buy government debt. Bonds often lose their lustre during boom times, particularly if inflation sets in.

 

There are other signs that investors are having some misgivings about growth.

                                               

Copper prices, which are seen as a reliable mirror of growth, tumbled about 3 percent Thursday after Mnuchin's comments. The metal, sometimes called "Dr. Copper" for its ability to signal the economy's direction, is up about 11 percent since the election but has fallen 4 percent since its mid-February peak.

 

These counter trends should be considered as contrarian indicators. THERE IS STILL CONSIDERABLE BEARISHNESS in this market.

 

Furthermore, perhaps investors, after 10 years of living in constant fear over a succession of financial and political cataclysms, have finally decided to tune out the headlines and focus instead on an economy that, while not great, is not doing so bad, either.

 

Ed Yardeni, a stock market strategist, calculates that savings deposits and money market funds, the two safest and lowest return options for the risk-wary, doubled to nearly $9 trillion at the end of last month from $4.5 trillion in early 2009. Since 2007 households in the USA have been a net seller of stocks, and have shrunk the amount of their financial assets in stocks by 18.6% since that time!

 

Perhaps a lot of this pent-up cash earning close to zero in terms of interest rates is finally going to start looking for higher returns in the stock market — with pension funds in particular leading the way. Perhaps, people are slowly starting to realize that you can get bent out of shape living in a sensationalist media environment but this noise has little to do with earnings and the valuation of those earnings in the stock market...

 

Thought of the Week

 

"We live in a world exquisitely dependent upon science and technology, in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology." -Carl Sagan

 

Stories and Ideas of Interest

 

  • These are the science concepts you need to know to understand political life in 2017. It’s early days of 2017 still, but already it’s become apparent that this year science will play a larger role in public discourse than it has in the past, at least in the US. The scientific community has found itself at odds with the new White House administration in countless ways, and is gearing up for a fight that will take place in labs and hacker spaces, in the halls of civic buildings, and in streets nationwide. Quartz has put together a compendium of the scientific concepts and terms that will be at the heart of these conversations—and will characterize the world of scientific discovery through the rest of the year. Concept #1 and perhaps the most important: skepticism: the application of reason to any and all ideas...

 

  • 7 earth-like planets found orbiting star 39 light-years away. Scientists have discovered what looks like the best place so far where life as we know it may exist outside our own solar system. The new findings raise hope that further systems are waiting to be discovered, the researchers say. And it's something that astronomers and exoplanet hunters are eager to explore.

 

  • The anatomy of charisma. What makes a person magnetic and why we should be wary. Nautlius puts together an excellent historical account of charisma showing both the positive and the negative. Charisma will never be stamped out nor should it be yet the way to protect people from the dark side of charisma is to teach them how it works. It is best thought of like fire. It can be used to heat your house or burn it all down…

 

 

  • Rich people literally see the world differently. Science of us magazine presents some controversial research demonstrating that “people who are higher in socioeconomic status have diminished neural responses to others’ pain,” the authors write. “These findings suggest that empathy, at least some early component of it, is reduced among those who are higher in status.” Generalizations are problematic but there are interesting implications for why  lower-class people are more attuned to the people around them. The authors write that “higher-status people are more focused on their own goals and desires. They also ignore people a little more, maybe because they can afford to. “If you have more power and status, you may not have to care as much about what people are thinking and feeling; and also, if you’re in a resource-scarce environment, where things are a little more unpredictable and maybe a little more dangerous, it would be very adaptive to pay attention to others, how they’re feeling and what they’re going to do.”

 

  • The next financial crisis may be in your driveway. Lured by low interest rates, low gas prices, and a crop of seductive vehicles that are faster, smarter, and more efficient than ever before, American drivers are increasingly riding in style. Nevertheless, all the glitter ain’t gold —those swanky machines are heavily leveraged. The country’s auto debt hit a record in the fourth quarter of 2016, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, when a rush of year-end car shopping pushed vehicle loans to a dubious peak of $1.16 trillion. The combination of new car smell and new credit woes stretches from Subarus in Maine to Teslas in San Francisco. Is it a surprise that Americans just clocked their biggest spike in stress in more than a decade...

 

  • As we sit at record highs in the market we should ask: should stocks be worth more now than they used to be? Stocks are not cheap. The CAPE ratio is 28.46, above the long-term average of 16.73 and more expensive than 96% of all readings. But exactly how expensive are they, and what might this mean for future returns? Michael Batnick puts together a very smart piece suggesting that expensive markets leave investors with a smaller margin for error. The more you pay, the less you get. Nevertheless, he makes some intelligent observations to counter the popular argument: “stocks are expensive, sell everything.” Let’s remember that long-term average stock returns smooth over the bull and bear markets that investors experience, and no two market cycles ever unfold the exact same way. Bull and bear markets can vary significantly in both duration and magnitude...

 

All the best for a productive week,

 

Logos LP

Contrarian Indicators Flashing

Good Morning,
 

U.S. equities closed mixed on Friday, but squeezed out another record close, while data released Thursday pointed to improving economic conditions in the U.S., with the Philadelphia Federal Reserve manufacturing index hitting its highest level since 1984, while weekly jobless claims remained around their lowest levels in decades.

 

Our Take

Buy baby buy. Forget any bearish news. Shrug it off and continue to buy stocks. This seems to be the prevailing mood right now with pullbacks lasting hours rather than days.


The issue is that when you look at the underlying fundamentals, they are quite good as companies are posting growth in earnings, rather than gaining because of some vague promise of tax cuts.

 

Although the rally has left the S&P 500 trading at three times book value for the first time since 2004, market-capitalization weighted earnings likely rose 10 percent in the fourth-quarter from a year earlier, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Of the 358 members that have reported results so far, 72 percent have shown profit growth.

 

Furthermore, inflation appears to be finally picking up. Since the global financial crisis, historically low inflation and restrained economic growth has allowed central banks to keep interest rates at record low levels. However, most policy makers are now anxious to return to a more “normal” environment where they will have more latitude to tighten or loosen monetary policy in response to changing circumstances. Even though they have kept policy on hold for now, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve are all anticipating higher inflation ahead, although it isn’t clear how quickly they will start raising rates.

 

Nevertheless, there are a few key things to take note of so as to take the temperature of the market and maintain one’s good sense as the market moves higher:  

 

  1. Notorious bears are starting to capitulate. Prem Watsa and George Soros just this week have changed their stance unwinding their shorts and getting long the Trump trade.
     

  2. The world’s largest sovereign wealth fund increased its allocation to equities: with the amount of noise out there about market being toppish it is interesting to see the Norwegian government looking to increase its allocation to equities. Late on Thursday afternoon, the Norwegian government proposed investing 70% of the country's £723 billion fund in the equity markets.
     

  3. Hedge funds piled into the consensus trades in Q4 2016: long the USD, long financials, healthcare, consumer discretionary, REITS and short tech, consumer staples, utilities and and bonds. Is the consensus ever right?
     

  4. There are still a lot of very negative bearish commentary all over the internet regarding the existence of a “bubble” and impending stock crash. This may be a significant contrarian indicator.
     

  5. There are still several black swan risks. The most significant being Marine Le Pen being elected as President in France. This would surely be a grave threat to the integrity of the European Union. In addition, Eurozone finance ministers and the IMF seem likely to miss next week's deadline to agree on a €7B bailout for Greece.

       

Musings
 

I was at a financial marketing conference in Orlando this week and had many great opportunities to chat with Americans about their new President Donald Trump. Many showed great disdain, some had no opinion, others expressed concern regarding his unpredictability and some were optimistic. Nevertheless, the prevailing mood amongst the stock market participants that I talked to was that his presidency is just not that relevant with regards to the direction of the stock market.

What lessons can we glean from this? Well first and foremost we should avoid letting our political opinions shape our investing decisions. Whether our savings should be in stocks, bonds or cash depends on our risk profile and our time horizon/investment goals. It should not be a function of our attitudes towards our heads of state.

There is no doubt that uncertainty can cause problems for markets yet allowing our political preferences to influence our investing decisions can cause us to misconstrue risk and/or to see more or less of it when there may in fact be less or more.

What we should remember is that the possibility of a major correction is EVER PRESENT.

This is the case no matter who is at the wheel and is more dependent upon economic cycles than on policy decisions. Thus, given current valuations which appear to be at the high end on a historical basis, the more intelligent question should be whether we are ok with say a 25% correction at this point in our lives?

If the answer is no, then less money should be allocated to stocks. If the answer is yes then perhaps we should keep on keeping on as stocks tend to offer excellent returns over the long term. Consider this illuminating chart from First Trust which highlights the historical performance of the S&P 500 Index throughout the U.S. Bull and Bear markets from 1926 through 2016.

 

-The average Bull Market period lasted 8.9 years with an average cumulative total return of 490%
 

-The average Bear Market period lasted 1.3 years with an average cumulative loss of -41%

Thought of the Week
 

" Roll with it.” -Charlie Munger to Trump Haters


Stories and Ideas of Interest

 

  • Contrarian indicator or indicator of the end? Wine glimmers like gold as investors see end to stocks rally. The benchmark wine index posted its first gain in six years. Bloomberg finds that: “Prices for fine wines have climbed to their highest levels since October 2011 on speculation that equities near record highs are poised to drop. Wines and the funds that buy them are being viewed much like gold -- as a store of value in uncertain times -- after the U.K. voted to leave the European Union and the U.S. elected Donald Trump as president.”

     

  • Housing bubble headlines in Canada are back in vogue, driven mostly by strength in the Toronto market. The annual rate of national house price inflation climbed to 13.0% year-over-year in January, up from the prior month's reading of 12.3%, according to the Teranet-National Bank Composite House Price Index. The jump was at least partially due to the ongoing housing boom in Toronto, which saw the annual rate of inflation climb to 20.9% year-over-year, up from 19.7%. Additionally, Reuters reports that Hamilton, an area near Toronto, saw home prices spike by 17.6% year-over-year as buyers were "shut out of the expensive Toronto market." A lot of this bearishness is nothing new yet one thing did jump out at me was new data indicating that the latest census figures show that Toronto’s population is growing at its slowest pace in 40 years. Is this sustainable?   

 

  • More Canadians are raiding their RRSP to buy a house, make ends meet and pay off debt. A new survey suggests Canadians are dipping into their registered retirement savings plans like never before and the high cost of housing may be driving those decisions.

 

  • Facebook has mega ambitions for job ads and our brains. Alison Griswold for Quartz suggests that: “Facebook’s users include LinkedIn’s ‘thought leaders’ and white-collar professionals, but they’re also people seeking hourly positions, part-time work, and other opportunities that they’d probably find on sites like Monster, Indeed, or Craigslist long before LinkedIn.” Facebook isn’t chasing Linkedin. It is chasing a far bigger jobs market. In other Facebook news, Bloomberg considers the danger of Facebook’s plan to rewire our lives…

 

  • Could the chaos of the industrial revolution be about to return? Bloomberg considers the argument that when old jobs are lost to technology, new ones will be created. The author suggests that upon closer study of the industrial revolution, this rosy thesis should be revised as this period of time brought calamity…

 

  • Fast food can reveal the secrets of an economy. The BBC digs into fast food indicators: “What is an economist’s favourite food? Burgers, chips and pizza might not immediately come to mind – but the consumption of meals like these can signal changes in people’s economic behaviour. Knowing the price of pizza in New York or the cost of a Big Mac in Beirut can tell market-watchers how the world’s cogs are turning.”

 

  • How can companies become and stay innovative? Fantastic work from BCG complete with excellent data and analysis on the top 50 most innovative companies in 2016.

 

All the best for a productive week,


Logos LP